Blog
Rajiv Singha

What do you think about Net Neutrality? – POLL

April 23, 2015
1,380
Estimated reading time: 2 minutes

Net Neutrality has been one of the hottest topics on the Internet for the past 1 year. And tomorrow is going to be its D-day as far as India is concerned.

What do you think about Net Neutrality - size

What is Net Neutrality?
Before we delve any further, let’s understand what Net Neutrality means. It is a principle which states that the Internet must be accessible by every intended user. It is about treating all Internet traffic equally without prioritizing any Internet service such as websites, applications, etc. This means, every packet of data should be treated normally in terms of speed, cost and access rights.

What does going against Net Neutrality mean?
For instance, you have hired a cab to your office, and you ask the driver to play your favorite radio station. But, the driver insists on a extra fee to oblige your request. If you choose not to pay, then he will tune in to the station of his choice. So, this scenario is somewhat similar to the situation of going against Net Neutrality.

If Net Neutrality is abolished, then users (consumers and businesses) would have to pay extra for accessing certain websites and services. Basically, the Internet highway would be divided into fast and slow lanes. The service that pays more to your Internet Service Provider (ISP) will have a faster loading time than the ones who pay less or nothing at all. Hence, the Internet will no more remain free and open, which it is actually meant to be.

What’s happening in India?
Till now, the ISPs in India have been adhering to the principle of Net Neutrality. However, at the present time major telecom operators like Airtel and Vodafone are planning to implement policies that will go against the concept of Net Neutrality, as explained above. So, TRAI (Telecom Regulatory Authority of India) released a consultation paper on 27 March 2015, to get a public feedback; the deadline to submit the response is tomorrow, 24 April 2015. So, based on the responses received, TRAI may take a call on whether Internet usage should be regulated in India or not.

POLL: Should Net Neutrality Be Abolished?
A) Yes
B) No

Leave your answer and views in the comments below.

For deeper insights into Net Neutrality, click here

Content source:
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/technology/story/everything-you-need-to-know-about-net-neutrality-in-india/1/429887.html
http://www.savetheinternet.com/net-neutrality-what-you-need-know-now

Have something to add to this story? Share it in the comments.

Rajiv Singha
About Rajiv Singha
Rajiv is an IT security news junkie and a computer security blogger at Quick Heal. He is passionate about promoting cybersecurity awareness, content and digital...
Articles by Rajiv Singha »

1,380 Comments

Leave a Reply to Damodaran Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

CAPTCHA Image

  1. mehul samdaniApril 23, 2015 at 5:09 PM

    no, Net neutrality should not be abolished. we all should have free and equal access to the Internet. #savetheinternet

    Reply
    • Aban PatelApril 23, 2015 at 7:28 PM

      No, Net neutrality should not be abolished. there must be free and equal access to the users of Internet. savetheinternet

      Reply
  2. pramod deshmukhApril 23, 2015 at 5:11 PM

    Net Neutrality should not be abolished .

    Reply
  3. Swapnil JoshiApril 23, 2015 at 5:12 PM

    No.

    Reply
  4. Satyam HirparaApril 23, 2015 at 5:14 PM

    NO it should not be

    Reply
  5. thakur tarun singhApril 23, 2015 at 5:14 PM

    Net neutrality is a necessity not a luxury.Net neutrality must not be abolished but should be adopted by the TRAI like countries like USA, Chile and Brazil have done. I personally request netizens to spread awareness among the people about this.

    Reply
  6. Das RealtorsApril 23, 2015 at 5:15 PM

    for like us all net users who have their business only on internet for them net neutrality is not good, it would be costly and heavy for us all and normal users also.
    it should be not supported.

    Reply
  7. Ajit G. KuradeApril 23, 2015 at 5:15 PM

    I am not in favor of abolishing net neutrality

    Reply
  8. NO WAY #savetheinternet

    Reply
  9. Net Neutrality should not be abolished
    we all believe in the internet freee for all policy

    Reply
  10. darshan desaiApril 23, 2015 at 5:17 PM

    net neutrality shd be there, it shouldn’t be abolished

    Reply
  11. GULU WATUMULLApril 23, 2015 at 5:18 PM

    TRAI should leave it open the way it is. If it is working like freedom of the press why fix it. It is not broken. Why is it that the government always messes up a good thing? We already have too many regulations. As far as spectrum is concerned the telephone companies bid the prices based on the previous way the internet operated.Freely.No one held a gun to their heads.It has been free since the internet started. The whole concept of the internet is global freedom and free communication on the web. It would be a shame to make rules which will restrict this entire concept that has worked so far…

    Reply
  12. Punak JedheApril 23, 2015 at 5:18 PM

    A

    Reply
  13. Sir,
    Net neutrality should abolish and current freedom of access of net should be carry on in further further.

    Satish

    Reply
  14. Pinak JedheApril 23, 2015 at 5:19 PM

    A

    Reply
  15. Net Neutrality must NOT Be Abolished. I poll for NO

    Reply
  16. Piyush SumanApril 23, 2015 at 5:19 PM

    Of Course This Net Neutrality Must Be Abolished Forever

    Reply
  17. Ranjit Kumar DebApril 23, 2015 at 5:20 PM

    I am in favour of net neutrality.

    Reply
  18. sylvester sequeiraApril 23, 2015 at 5:20 PM

    I feel the telecom companies should go ahead with their charges as people are going more online than enjoying their life.
    Extra charges would demotivate them and encourage people to concentrate on their real life than on their virtual life.

    Reply
    • DEEPAK KUMARApril 24, 2015 at 12:42 AM

      very right,telecom companies should concentrate to increase speed and quality of internet in India rather then providing sub standard services to everyone.We will get more things done in less time although tariff should not be too high to afford.here i’m talking about homeusers not corporate sector which will not get effected by any price hike.

      Reply
  19. Umesh JotkarApril 23, 2015 at 5:21 PM

    NO

    Reply
  20. Vinayak MedhiApril 23, 2015 at 5:22 PM

    there must be net Neutrality and equality of net tariffs for all without any discrimination.

    Reply
  21. Jagrut GosaiApril 23, 2015 at 5:22 PM

    No, Net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  22. PramodTandelApril 23, 2015 at 5:24 PM

    NO

    Reply
  23. Sumit A.MistryApril 23, 2015 at 5:25 PM

    Yes, Internet charges should be common for all website.

    Reply
  24. Akshay MadhaviApril 23, 2015 at 5:25 PM

    No

    Reply
  25. ARUN SINGHApril 23, 2015 at 5:26 PM

    NET NEUTRALITY SHOULD NOT BE ABOLISHED

    Reply
  26. Sumit A.MistryApril 23, 2015 at 5:26 PM

    Yes internet charges should be on common all website

    Reply
  27. No. Net neutrality should not abolished. I am totally FOR net neutrality

    Reply
  28. Dinesh PatelApril 23, 2015 at 5:28 PM

    No

    Reply
  29. POLL: Should Net Neutrality Be Abolished?
    Answer: NO NO NO NO ON NEVER
    If it happens then we’ll be able to access only facebook,twitter etc. or other well known sites with most of ISPs.
    _

    Reply
  30. shaurya guptaApril 23, 2015 at 5:29 PM

    Net neutrality should not be abolished…
    From my side it is a big NO..

    Reply
  31. Rinzen Norbu BhutiaApril 23, 2015 at 5:29 PM

    NO, Net should remain neutral,
    if abolished, this would be a huge setback in the development of developing countries like india
    Jai Hind

    Reply
  32. Yes..It should be abolished

    Reply
  33. Net should remain neutral

    Reply
  34. rajesh rathodApril 23, 2015 at 5:32 PM

    No NET Neutrality

    Reply
  35. B) No

    Reply
  36. R.K.SHARMAApril 23, 2015 at 5:33 PM

    nobody should be allowed to interfere with net neutrality and we will all fight against it so that next time no one even dares to think about it

    Reply
  37. Net neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  38. Anil AwatadeApril 23, 2015 at 5:33 PM

    There is no need to abolish the Net Neutrality

    Reply
  39. Parwej PathanApril 23, 2015 at 5:33 PM

    lootane ka naya tarika aur kuchh nahi

    Reply
  40. Service operator must be keep all user same,they can’t divide in rich and poor. government must be interfear in it

    Reply
  41. net neutrality should not be abolished. internet should be easly accessible for every one.

    Reply
  42. Dinesh KumarApril 23, 2015 at 5:35 PM

    we are not in favor of paying extra. Sir, now if you will agree with companies then one days will be there where every site will have the tie ups with service providers and they will charge site wise. Example we are using frequently 15 sites in 28 days, but paying 177 for 28 days for any site. If you will go with companies then if they charge 10 Rs. per site for 28 days then we will only be able to use only these 15 sites not single one extra and this will be a dangerous reason of far being from the world.
    Today we are using NEWS to get update with the world but if this decision goes in favor of companies then 50% population will far from this. Now these days internet is the basic requirement of an educated person. You can your self understand the issues of future. Please think from the bottom line before the decesion.

    Reply
  43. Bramh NarayanApril 23, 2015 at 5:36 PM

    To the Chairman, TRAI

    Thank you for giving me this opportunity to share my views on the consultation paper published by TRAI on March 27, 2015 titled “Regulatory Framework For Over-the-Top (OTT) Services”. I am worried that this consultation paper makes sweeping assumptions about the Internet, and does not take a neutral and balanced view of the subject of Internet Licensing and Net Neutrality. Any public consultation must be approached in a neutral manner by the regulator, so that people can form an informed opinion.

    I strongly support an open internet, for which I believe it is critical to uphold net neutrality and reject any moves towards licensing of Internet applications and Web services.

    I urge TRAI to commit to outlining measures to protect and advance net neutrality for all Indians. Net neutrality requires that the Internet be maintained as an open platform, on which network providers treat all content, applications and services equally, without discrimination. The TRAI must give importance to safeguarding the interests of our country’s citizens and the national objective of Digital India and Make In India, over claims made by some corporate interests.

    I request that my response be published on the TRAI website alongside other comments filed, in line with past practice regarding public consultations. I urge that TRAI issue a specific response to user submissions after examining the concerns raised by them, and hold open house discussions across India, accessible to users and startups before making any recommendations.

    Question 1: Is it too early to establish a regulatory framework for Internet/OTT services, since internet penetration is still evolving, access speeds are generally low and there is limited coverage of high-speed broadband in the country? Or, should some beginning be made now with a regulatory framework that could be adapted to changes in the future? Please comment with justifications.

    No new regulatory framework in the telecom sector is required for Internet services and apps – and no such regulation should come into effect in future either.

    This question incorrectly presumes that regulation of the Internet is absent and there is a need to create it. Additionally, the technical language of “Over-the-Top” applications used in the consultation paper fails to convey that it is truly referring to the online services and applications which make today’s Internet which we all use; Facebook, Ola, Zomato, Paytm, WhatsApp, Zoho and Skype etc. The Internet is already subject to existing law in India – any extra regulatory or licensing regime will only be detrimental to the customer and to Indian firms developing online services and apps.

    Under the current regulatory framework, users can access the internet-based services and apps either for a low fee or for free where the application owners make money by selling advertisements based on user data. With additional regulations and licenses, it will make it expensive for these services to reach out to their customers eventually leading to higher prices and undesirable levels of advertising – which is against the public interest and counterproductive.

    It appears that the telecom companies are shifting goalposts. Many telecom companies have earlier argued in the consultation paper floated by TRAI on mobile value added services (MVAS) that it was not necessary to regulate these value added services. They said MVAS are already governed by general laws under the Indian legal system and comply with the security interests as they operate on the networks of legitimate telecom license holders. Internet platforms also are regulated and governed by general laws in addition to specialised laws such as the Information Technology Act, and the same treatment should be extended to them as well.

    As TRAI said previously in its recommendations after consulting on MVAS regulation:

    “The Authority preferred least intrusive and minimal regulatory framework and thus no separate category of licence for value added services is envisaged. After second round of consultations, the Authority is also not favoring registration of Value Added Service Providers (VASPs) or content aggregators under the “Other Service Provider (OSP)” category.”

    “Content shall be subject to relevant content regulation and compliance of prevailing copyrights including digital management rights and other laws on the subject (para 3.12.2). The content is subjected to content regulation/ guidelines of Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Information Technology Act, 2000, Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995, Indian Copyright Act etc., as amended from time to time. The content regulation shall be as per law in force from time to time. There should be consistency in the treatment of content across all kinds of media including print, digital/multimedia to avoid any discrimination. (para 3.13.3):”

    Imposing a licensing and regulation regime carry significant risks of destroying innovation. Launching new services and features will take more time and will make it difficult for new startups with low cash reserves to enter the market. It will basically ring the death knell for the country’s fast-growing digital media sector.

    Question 2: Should the Internet/OTT players offering communication services (voice, messaging and video call services through applications (resident either in the country or outside) be brought under the licensing regime? Please comment with justifications.

    There is no need to bring Internet platforms offering communication services under the telecom licensing regime. The way this question is framed gives an impression that there is a clear distinction between communication services and other non-communication services on the internet. This is an incorrect presumption. Many internet services incorporate real time chat and video services to improve their customer engagement. A licensing framework will, for sure, work against customer interest and will stifle innovation. The cost of entry to the market would increase many times over which will be extremely detrimental to newer startups who might have more innovative offerings for the market.

    Telecom operators need to have licenses to operate since they use a public resource: spectrum. It utilizes the spectrum to transmit data packets, voice and SMS communication and acts a dumb pipe. However, communication services such as Skype, WhatsApp, Viber and others sit atop the networks and infrastructure already controlled and owned by the telecom operators. Where Voice-over-Internet-Protocol services connect into the normal switched telecom network, TRAI’s VoIP regulations already exist. Therefore, there is no need for internet-based communication services to hold separate licenses.

    Question 3: Is the growth of Internet/OTT impacting the traditional revenue stream of Telecom operators/Telecom operators? If so, is the increase in data revenues of the Telecom Operators sufficient to compensate for this impact? Please comment with reasons.

    There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that VoIP services like Hike or Skype are cannibalising voice revenues of telecom operators. In fact, heads of more than one Indian telecom operator have clearly stated the same over the past few months. For example, Airtel India CEO Gopal Vittal had said during the company’s earnings conference call, earlier this year, that there’s no evidence of VoIP cannibalisation of voice services. Last year, Idea Cellular MD Himanshu Kapania had also said that OTT apps like Viber have had some impact on their International calling business, but on regular voice calls, there was no impact.

    We also need to remember that data revenues also fall under the traditional revenue streams category as per the Unified Access License Agreement (http://www.dot.gov.in/access-services/introduction-unified-access-servicescellular-mobile-services). So, it is factually incorrect to say that increase in data revenues will affect traditional revenue streams.

    A Morgan Stanley report on the Indian telecom industry from last year mentions that data revenues is likely to contribute about 23% of telecom operators’ overall revenues over the next two years. A study jointly done by AT Kearney and Google estimated that telecom companies will earn an additional $8 billion in revenues by 2017 due to the proliferation of data and data-based services.

    Question 4: Should the Internet/OTT players pay for use of the Telecom Operators network over and above data charges paid by consumers? If yes, what pricing options can be adopted? Could such options include prices based on bandwidth consumption? Can prices be used as a means of product/service differentiation? Please comment with justifications.

    As I argue in my answers above, telecom companies are expected to grow steadily and so is data. Public statements made by officials of telecom companies, their earnings report and analysis of independent agencies suggest that telecom companies will continue to grow. So, there is no need for them to impose additional revenue from customers – and there is especially no justification of creating an extra revenue source supported by government intervention. The term “bandwidth consumption” is ambiguous. Currently, customers are billed for the quantum of data used and not the bandwidth.

    Charging users an additional fee over and above the data charges to access specific internet services will result in higher costs which will dissuade people from using such services. Moreover, as explained earlier, many online businesses have video and chat applications within them to interact with customers. In such cases, it will be extremely difficult for users to ascertain the sum billed to them if they access the websites of such businesses. There will be no transparency in billing and it will run afoul of TRAI’s own 2006 Quality of Service Billing regulations which ensures transparency in billing and tariff plans.

    Taking an additional fee also breaks the internet. Today, many websites, especially blogs, have hyperlinked content and users can switch from one website to another without having to worry about access or cost. But differential pricing will not provide such a seamless experience. Moreover, it tends to favor the larger firms with deep pockets, essentially not providing a level-playing field.

    Question 5: Do you agree that imbalances exist in the regulatory environment in the operation of Internet/OTT players? If so, what should be the framework to address these issues? How can the prevailing laws and regulations be applied to Internet/OTT players (who operate in the virtual world) and compliance enforced? What could be the impact on the economy? Please comment with justifications.

    There is no regulatory imbalance in the environment in which the internet services and applications operate. In fact, the word “regulatory imbalance” is incorrect here. Telecom operators holds licenses to spectrum which is a public resource. Internet services and applications don’t have to acquire licenses. Moreover, there is a clear distinction between services provided by telecom operators and internet platforms—so no additional regulation is required.

    Also, internet services and applications are already well-covered under the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Indian Penal Code, 1860. More importantly, internet services are intermediaries that allow a communication system for their users—and intermediaries cannot be held responsible for the acts of their users as per Section 79 of the IT Act, 2000. Our Supreme Court has recently ruled on this area in the Shreya Singhal versus Union of India case, holding that Internet content is protected by our Constitution’s right to free expression and setting out the acceptable limits for government regulation.

    Question 6: How should the security concerns be addressed with regard to OTT players providing communication services? What security conditions such as maintaining data records, logs etc. need to be mandated for such OTT players? And, how can compliance with these conditions be ensured if the applications of such OTT players reside outside the country? Please comment with justifications.

    The internet services and apps are well-covered under the existing laws and regulations. These include the Code of Criminal Procedure, Indian Telegraph Act, Indian Telegraph Rules, and the Information Technology Act and its different rules pertaining to intermediaries and interception. These different regulations allow the Indian government and law enforcement agencies to access the data stored by internet platforms when deemed legally necessary. Any additional regulations carry grave risk of breaching user privacy and would also require constitutional review – especially since the Government is still working on a proposed Privacy Bill.

    The government and courts also have the power to block access to websites on the grounds of national security and public order. It has taken similar steps in the past and has been widely reported by the media. The transparency reports periodically published by major internet companies suggests Indian government routinely requests for user data and blocking of user accounts. Between July 2014 and December 2014, Indian authorities had 5,473 requests for data, covering 7,281 user accounts from Facebook and the company had a compliance rate of 44.69%. Google had a compliance rate of 61% with respect to the requests made by different government agencies across India.

    Question 7: How should the OTT players offering app services ensure security, safety and privacy of the consumer? How should they ensure protection of consumer interest? Please comment with justifications.

    Although user privacy and security is of paramount importance, additional regulation carries the inherent risk of breaching user privacy which is not in the consumer’s interest. The Information Technology Act, 2000 already addresses the security concerns of the user. But more importantly, any criminal act committed using these platforms can be tried under the Indian Penal Code. So, there is no need to burden the internet platforms with additional regulations.

    Also, it is worth noting that many telecom companies in India have not made information publicly available as to whether and how they comply with regulations that guarantee security, privacy and safety of the customer. TRAI’s current paper fails to articulate why the internet services and apps should be brought under similar regulations.

    Question 8:

    In what manner can the proposals for a regulatory framework for OTTs in India draw from those of ETNO, referred to in para 4.23 or the best practices summarised in para 4.29? And, what practices should be proscribed by regulatory fiat? Please comment with justifications.

    ETNO is similar to India’s COAI which makes it an industry lobby group. Understandably, the suggestions made by ETNO heavily favor the telecom companies and will be detrimental to customers if India refers to their suggestions.

    ETNO’s stand have been widely criticized in the past. Europe’s own group of government regulators [Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communication (BEREC)]

    http://berec.europa.eu/files/document_register_store/2012/11/BoR_%2812%29_120_BEREC_on_ITR.pdf ETNO’s proposals could jeopardize the “continued development of the open, dynamic and global platform that the Internet provides” which will “lead to an overall loss of welfare”. Additionally, the international free expression group Article 19 says ETNO’s proposal “would seriously undermine net neutrality.

    According to Access Now, ETNO’s recommendations would have meant higher data charges for customers while from an entrepreneur’s standpoint, it will limit their ability to reach out to a wider market. For a small but fast growing startup and digital media sector in India, this can potentially ring the death knell. ETNO’s suggestions on this subject so far have failed to have been accepted by any government agency – including the regulators in their own host countries. It is therefore especially troubling that TRAI is choosing to make one of their proposals a pillar of this public consultation here in India.

    Question 9: What are your views on net-neutrality in the Indian context? How should the various principles discussed in para 5.47 be dealt with? Please comment with justifications.

    Net Neutrality, by definition, means no discrimination of traffic flowing on the internet with respect to speed, access and price. Chile and Brazil, which are developing countries just like India, have passed laws supporting net neutrality. This is in addition to government commitments to implement net neutrality legislation in the United States and European Union.

    India has 1 billion people without internet access and it is imperative for our democracy to have an open and free internet where users are free to choose the services they want to access—instead of a telecom operator deciding what information they can access.

    Internet apps and services are expected to contribute 5% to India’s GDP by 2020. That will only happen of entrepreneurs, big and small, have a level playing field that encourages innovation and non-preferential treatment—something that net neutrality ensures.

    Assuming there is no net neutrality, only the big players will be able to strike deals with telcos while the smaller players remain inaccessible, which will go against the principles of net neutrality as listed below:

    No blocking by TSPs and ISPs on specific forms of internet traffic, services and applications.

    No slowing or “throttling” internet speeds by TSPs and ISPs on specific forms of internet traffic, services and applications.

    No preferential treatment of services and platforms by TSPs and ISPs.

    It is also worth noting that the proposed framework will give too much power in the hands of the telecom companies, which is not healthy for the ecosystem.

    Question 10: What forms of discrimination or traffic management practices are reasonable and consistent with a pragmatic approach? What should or can be permitted? Please comment with justifications.

    This question assumes that traffic discrimination is necessary and is a norm. Rather, traffic discrimination should be an exception as it is against the principles of net neutrality.

    In such exceptional cases, telecom companies need to have the permission of TRAI or other competent government agency through public hearing to carry out “traffic management” to ensure transparency in the entire process. Further, it should be kept in mind that such steps shouldn’t interfere with the access, affordability and quality of the services.

    More importantly, https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/sites/digital-agenda/files/Traffic%20Management%20Investigation%20BEREC_2.pdf jointly by BEREC and the European Commission suggest that the propensity of the telecom operators to restrict access of internet services is high. The report noted that telecom operators were most inclined to block and throttle P2P services on mobile as well as fixed line networks. VoIP, on the other hand, was blocked mostly on telecom networks.

    Keeping this in mind, TRAI needs to ensure that instances of discrimination of traffic should be few, far between and, above all, transparent.

    Question 11: Should the TSPs be mandated to publish various traffic management techniques used for different OTT applications? Is this a sufficient condition to ensure transparency and a fair regulatory regime?

    Publishing detailed reports of various traffic management techniques for different internet services is a step in the right direction but it is definitely not sufficient. I believe it gives a false impression to consumers that traffic management is a permissible act, which it is not as it goes against the tenets of net neutrality. Making the various traffic management techniques public would ensure transparency to some extent but it fails to bring in accountability on the part of telecom operators—which is equally important.

    There needs to be an auditing mechanism that would scrutinize and penalize telecom companies in case of any unlawful traffic management techniques. Also, telecom companies should be mandated to submit any traffic management-related data to TRAI, which should be made publicly available on TRAI’s website.

    The need for transparency and accountability is highlighted during the recent case of Airtel allegedly throttling Ogle, an online video service, on its network (http://www.medianama.com/2014/12/223-airtel-net-neutrality-ogle-throttling/).

    Question 12: How should a conducive and balanced environment be created such that TSPs are able to invest in network infrastructure and CAPs are able to innovate and grow? Who should bear the network upgradation costs? Please comment with justifications

    The underlying assumption of the question suggests that currently there is an imbalance in the environment within which telecom operators and internet services operate. However, as I have pointed out it my previous answers, no such imbalance exists. Telecom firms and internet services have distinct functions. The former has to provide the infrastructure to access content and the latter has to provide the platforms for users to create content. As financial results of the telecom operators and analysis by various independent agencies have shown that revenues from data are soaring. So, it makes logical sense for the telecom operators to invest to upgrade and improve their network infrastructure.

    On the contrary, I would argue that there is no incentive for the telecom firms to invest to upgrade their networks if they charge the CAP instead of charging the customer for data. They would seek to further increase its revenues coming from the CAPs, a move that will be disastrous for India’s telecommunications industry.

    Question 13: Should TSPs be allowed to implement non-price based discrimination of services? If so, under what circumstances are such practices acceptable? What restrictions, if any, need to be placed so that such measures are not abused? What measures should be adopted to ensure transparency to consumers? Please comment with justifications.

    Discrimination of services in any form is detrimental for the growth of the telecom industry itself and there should be no circumstance for a telecom operator to do so. Given the diverse nature of the Internet, telecom operators should not be allowed to determine what type of service should get more priority. For example, a consumer in India probably relies on VoIP calls to keep in touch with people abroad and if there is throttling of these services, it infringes on the user’s fundamental right of freedom of expression. An Internet service that a telecom operator thinks which could lead to traffic congestion, might be vital to consumers. Further, a telecom operator might use throttling to further a service promoted by them and induce consumers into using them, thereby eliminating choice.

    Transparency alone will not bring about a fair regime for users, and it is crucial that TSPs be prohibited from discriminating between services

    Question 14: Is there a justification for allowing differential pricing for data access and OTT communication services? If so, what changes need to be brought about in the present tariff and regulatory framework for telecommunication services in the country? Please comment with justifications.

    The question above is simply a rephrasing Question 13. Differential pricing for data access and OTT communication services again simply amounts to discrimination of data services. Hence there is no justification for differential pricing other than furthering corporate profit. Telecom operators stand to gain substantially from the proliferation of all data services including communication services. A neutral internet allows smaller companies to innovate and compete with larger players and ensure that there is a free market. Any changes in the present tariff and regulatory framework is not needed save for ensuring that the interests of the consumer is taken care of.

    Question 15: Should OTT communication service players be treated as Bulk User of Telecom Services (BuTS)? How should the framework be structured to prevent any discrimination and protect stakeholder interest? Please comment with justification.

    Treating OTT communication service players as Bulk User of Telecom Services again amounts to discrimination of data services and hence it should not be allowed. The question also further assumes that the stakeholders are only the telecom operators and not the consumers. If only the interests of the telecom operators are protected by treating services which compete with their traditional services differently rather than innovating themselves, it would lead to a situation of anti-competitiveness. Telecom companies have an interest in imposing their control over information and communication networks, but the price of that would mean stifling competition, increased barriers for innovation and business and eventually infringe on the fundamental rights of Indian citizens.

    Question 16: What framework should be adopted to encourage India-specific OTT apps? Please comment with justifications.

    A recent Deloitte report titled Technology, Media and Telecommunications India Predictions 2015 predicted that paid apps will generate over Rs 1500 crore revenues in 2015 (http://bit.ly/1alhH5S). Increased acceptance of paid apps can only be possible if there’s Network Neutrality. In fact, Deepinder Goyal, the founder and CEO of the highly successful app Zomato recently commented “Couldn’t have built Zomato if we had a competitor on something like Airtel Zero”

    The moment an app developer/company is forced to tie-up with a telecom operator to ensure that users opt for it, an artificial prohibitive barrier will be created. All app developers and the companies behind them need to be provided an even playing field.

    We also need more reports on the Indian app economy, to understand, firstly, how the adoption and usage of apps is changing and, secondly, to comprehend its impact on the Indian economy.

    Question 17: If the OTT communication service players are to be licensed, should they be categorised as ASP or CSP? If so, what should be the framework? Please comment with justifications.

    The question of categorising doesn’t even arise, because as mentioned earlier any extra regulations or licensing is going to be detrimental to the end user. Requiring licensing of online services and mobile apps under the current telecom framework in India will have enormous negative consequences. The impossibly onerous burdens imposed by such licensing would results in many such globally developed services and apps not being launched in India – and our own startup efforts to develop local versions of such apps being killed in their early stages. The net results would be decreased consumer benefit and a massive slowdown in innovation and reduced “Make in India” efforts due to the regulatory cost of doing business becoming very high.

    Question 18: Is there a need to regulate subscription charges for OTT communication services? Please comment with justifications.

    Subscription charges for such apps need to be allowed to evolve as it would in a pure market economy. The subscribers (buyers) would want to pay the lowest possible price, and the app developers/companies (sellers) would want to charge as much as possible, eventually leading to a fair price.

    Subscription charges for such Internet-based services have remained, more or less, quite low in India, especially because the cost of switching from one service provider to another is also quite low: This competition will ensure that charges remain fair, without the need to regulate them, going forward as well. As noted in response to earlier questions, existing Indian law also applies to online services – which would include the Consumer Protection Act and other regulations meant to prevent cheating or other illegal pricing issues.

    Question 19: What steps should be taken by the Government for regulation of non-communication OTT players? Please comment with justifications.

    As mentioned earlier, irrespective of what an OTT app is used for (communication, online shopping, etc) they’re all essentially Internet-based services, and hence there is no question of creating new regulatory measures.

    Question 20: Are there any other issues that have a bearing on the subject discussed?

    In the interim, TRAI should issue an order or regulation preventing network neutrality violations by telecom service providers. Some telecom companies have shown scant respect for the issues presently under consideration and despite its questionable legality have rolled out various services which violate network neutrality. Any delay in forming regulations or preventing them in the interim till the process is complete is only likely to consolidate their status. This is not only an affront to the Internet users in India but also to the regulatory powers of the TRAI.

    If the question of regulating subscription charges arises because of the fear of OTT communication services/VoIP cannibalising Voice services by telcos, then it needs to be pointed out that more than one telecom operator in India has already come out and said that there’s no evidence to support such a fear.

    Earlier this year, Airtel India CEO Gopal Vittal had clearly said during the company’s earnings conference call that there’s no evidence of VoIP cannibalisation of voice services (http://bit.ly/1DzZQ77 – pdf). Last year, Idea Cellular MD Himanshu Kapania had also said that OTT apps like Viber have had some impact on their International calling business, but on regular voice calls, there was no impact (http://www.medianama.com/2014/07/223-idea-cellular-viber/).

    Reply
  44. Dr Arushi GoyalApril 23, 2015 at 5:36 PM

    No

    Reply
  45. Internet traffic should be equally distributed without prioritizing specific sites. Net neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  46. Neerav MotwaniApril 23, 2015 at 5:38 PM

    yes

    Reply
  47. mangesh muleyApril 23, 2015 at 5:39 PM

    no

    Reply
  48. Sushil SharmaApril 23, 2015 at 5:40 PM

    Net Neutrality should be maintained, no second thought on abolishment, otherwise it will like snatching indpendance of net users

    Reply
  49. Ajay AgarwalApril 23, 2015 at 5:40 PM

    Net Neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  50. Biswajit DekaApril 23, 2015 at 5:41 PM

    Not at all acceptable.

    Reply
  51. Net Neutrality should not Abolished

    Reply
  52. Naresh SharmaApril 23, 2015 at 5:42 PM

    Abolishing Net neutrality may give power to a few only whereas its continuance would benefit greater segment of people in democracy like india. To my mind, the aim of net neutrality must cater to more number of citizens and its abolishion will empower only the web magnates of media controllers.

    Reply
  53. Bibek ChowdhuryApril 23, 2015 at 5:43 PM

    no

    Reply
  54. Smit ChampaneriApril 23, 2015 at 5:45 PM

    Yes it should be abolished………………………

    Reply
  55. KUMAR BANDHUApril 23, 2015 at 5:45 PM

    Net neutrality should be maintained.

    Reply
  56. Jigar DhullaApril 23, 2015 at 5:47 PM

    No

    Reply
  57. No, Net Neutrality should stay

    Reply
  58. Manish MudaliarApril 23, 2015 at 5:48 PM

    Let us ensure that net neutrality prevails in India and every one has equal rights to information and not create class categories (a penchant of we Indians)in the virtual world too. Let the corporate interests not dictate terms of how and what information each Indian should access. Let us not make the internet go the private educational and health care way…

    Reply
  59. BISWARANJAN DASApril 23, 2015 at 5:48 PM

    B-NO

    Reply
  60. shekhar deshpandeApril 23, 2015 at 5:51 PM

    B

    Reply
  61. Completely undesirable

    Reply
  62. Marshivane Madhav Sopan jalkot District LaturApril 23, 2015 at 5:51 PM

    Net neutrality is must in our country like India to be a smart country!

    Reply
  63. Arjun PaulApril 23, 2015 at 5:51 PM

    NO

    Reply
  64. pankaj kumarApril 23, 2015 at 5:52 PM

    Why people leave the internet Alone?

    Reply
  65. NIRAJ KEDIAApril 23, 2015 at 5:52 PM

    No Net Neutrality should not be abolished. It is must for every developing country.

    Reply
  66. v.sitaramanApril 23, 2015 at 5:52 PM

    Net neutrality to be maintained

    Reply
  67. Devesh SengarApril 23, 2015 at 5:53 PM

    Net Neutrality should not Be Abolished

    Reply
  68. jasmin bhalodiaApril 23, 2015 at 5:54 PM

    yes

    Reply
  69. Umang ShahApril 23, 2015 at 5:54 PM

    Net Neutrality should prevail and should not be abolished.

    Reply
  70. Awadhesh khannaApril 23, 2015 at 5:54 PM

    I support Net Neutrality. It is a very basic need along side ROTI, KAPDA, MAKAAN, CONNECTIVITY(MOBILE PHONES) AND NET NEUTRALITY.

    Reply
  71. ARUN BACHANKARApril 23, 2015 at 5:55 PM

    B

    Reply
  72. N.M.ShingoteApril 23, 2015 at 5:56 PM

    Internet Should Always Be Neutral & Fully Independent . No One Person Or Establishment Or Country To Own it.

    N.M.Shingote , Nashik , Maharashtra , INDIA

    Reply
  73. Robin Pal ChoudhuryApril 23, 2015 at 5:57 PM

    Net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  74. Ravindar ThotApril 23, 2015 at 5:57 PM

    Neutrality should be with proper conditions.

    Reply
  75. Dr. S. Sriman NarayananApril 23, 2015 at 5:57 PM

    We should have net neutrality.

    Reply
  76. Roger SamuelApril 23, 2015 at 5:58 PM

    This is a planned way of ruling government to help corporates making easy money from habitual internet users. It should be opposed by all citizens of India.

    Reply
  77. Dr. S. Sriman NarayananApril 23, 2015 at 5:59 PM

    Net for all should be the principle of the government

    Reply
  78. AJEET SHARMAApril 23, 2015 at 6:00 PM

    Net neutrality is like to move any where in our own country.If net neutrality is abolished than we feel that we are in Foreign country in our own country.Little some of Telecomm companies try to make money from innocent customer.Governmet should take action against all telecomm operator and stand firm with net neutrality.

    Reply
  79. sugata sinhaApril 23, 2015 at 6:01 PM

    net neutrality should not be abolished. it is at the core of internet architecture. if NN is abolished it will hamper the free flow of data through internet and in various ways it will affect the democracy itself.

    Reply
  80. Sandeep GuptaApril 23, 2015 at 6:01 PM

    B
    Net Neutrality should not be abolished, each one should have equal access

    Reply
  81. Sharmila ShankarApril 23, 2015 at 6:02 PM

    B) No

    Net neutrality should not be abolished, because many people cannot otherwise afford the only entertainment they have, which is the internet, which comes for a low cost. If this is also taken away from the people, what is the point of the internet? Even overseas, the total cost of the internet is low and people do not charge you extra for visiting certain websites and they do not discriminate against people.

    Reply
  82. Mausam JainApril 23, 2015 at 6:02 PM

    Yes

    Reply
  83. no, net neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  84. it should remain neutral….no interference…

    Reply
  85. kailash sharmaApril 23, 2015 at 6:03 PM

    its totally wrong.

    Reply
  86. Anil kumarApril 23, 2015 at 6:06 PM

    Answer is big NO.
    Each and everybody who are born in India should have the same rights and facility. Hope it works out fast

    Reply
  87. Subrata PaulApril 23, 2015 at 6:06 PM

    No, Net Neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  88. Vishnu Kumar AgarwalApril 23, 2015 at 6:07 PM

    We are living in independent India now. From where these idea of regulating has come? We really wonder. We all need full freedom and we must get it. It should be treated as our fundamental rights provided by our constitution.
    Jai Hind!

    Reply
  89. RajasekaranApril 23, 2015 at 6:08 PM

    B)NO. Net neutrality should continue and usage of internet shall not be regulated as it is not any individual’s property.

    Reply
  90. Dr. Yatin DholakiaApril 23, 2015 at 6:09 PM

    Net neutrality should NOT be abolished

    Reply
  91. Bimal Chandra MajumderApril 23, 2015 at 6:09 PM

    Net Neutrality is must.

    Reply
  92. B)NO.

    Reply
  93. Devendrakumar R. BaraiApril 23, 2015 at 6:13 PM

    Yes Net Neutrality Should Be Abolished..

    Reply
  94. Vishnu Kumar AgarwalApril 23, 2015 at 6:13 PM

    My Comment is ‘NO’
    Net Neutrality must not be abolished if we consumers has to pay anything extra.

    Reply
  95. Pravin ChauhanApril 23, 2015 at 6:14 PM

    Net Neutrality Be Abolished

    Reply
  96. Sachin DivekarApril 23, 2015 at 6:14 PM

    Internet Should be Neutral towards Users. So My Response is “B” that is NO.

    Reply
  97. yes net neutrality

    Reply
  98. No.under no circumstances it should be abolished .Then

    Reply
  99. it’s happening Only in India…?
    Net Neutrality…!! I think it`s a political agenda, government testing the Indian people..What we are thinking…I told him only Mr.Govt. please think about your own speech Electronic Karanti…you say everywhere in india or out of India then after we all people lesion from your dept against “NET-NEUTRALITY”.Why….???
    All Indian people want internet AAZADI….no bound accept..!!
    think gov..gov..gov..!!

    Reply
  100. subhash patneApril 23, 2015 at 6:18 PM

    If net neutrality is abolished, it will defeat the very purpose of introducing internet services. Internet users will unnecessarily be taxed, speed of usage will slow down because he will not be able to access some websites or services smoothly and immediately, net access will be restricted, will create divisions among users and the principles of equality will be defeated. So I am totally against abolishing net neutrality and I vote against the proposal.

    Reply
  101. KETANKUMAR PUJARAApril 23, 2015 at 6:18 PM

    Net neutrality to be continued. There should no separate charges for using net for individual sites.

    Reply
  102. it most definitely should not be abolished

    Reply
  103. akash kumar panwarApril 23, 2015 at 6:19 PM

    net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  104. M K JindalApril 23, 2015 at 6:20 PM

    NO

    Reply
  105. Going away from net neutrality will kill internet services in our country and Govt. will also be at loss as many forthcoming services needs free internet usage, I mean to say that net neutrality is a must for our country.

    Reply
  106. Internet must have chip.

    Reply
  107. It should not be abolished

    Reply
  108. Net Neutrality must be Abolished

    Reply
  109. Vivek RajputApril 23, 2015 at 6:26 PM

    In my view net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  110. Natvar prajapatiApril 23, 2015 at 6:28 PM

    A very big “NO”.

    Net neutrality has to remain at all costs.

    Reply
  111. NOT SO WELL

    Reply
  112. Amar PreetApril 23, 2015 at 6:30 PM

    yes

    Reply
  113. Padmakar Ganpatrao MavlankarApril 23, 2015 at 6:31 PM

    No ,Net neutrality should not be abolished.
    Abolishing net neutrality will lead to monopoly and net users will be forced to pay as desired by operaters.
    GOVERNMENT SHOULD PROTECT PEOPLE AND REGULATE CORPORATIONS,AND NOT PROTECT CORPORATIONS AND REGULATE PEOPLE.

    Reply
  114. Siddharth KatjuApril 23, 2015 at 6:32 PM

    No

    Reply
  115. Padmakar Ganpatrao MavlankarApril 23, 2015 at 6:32 PM

    No ,Net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  116. i am not supporting for Net Neutrality, because we dont know at which time we necesary to that site. wether that site may be may not be in Net Neutrality pack, it i cause a problem to the users who use it.

    many of the users works on online ads to earn money if all these sites comes under Net Neutrality how they access these site they have to may more than they earn

    few of the people and home makes get relax with songs, games, movies and social sites what about those home makers

    Reply
  117. Net Nuterality should not be abolished

    Reply
  118. siddharth soniApril 23, 2015 at 6:39 PM

    Yes i m in favour of net neutrality

    Reply
  119. Shankar Nath JhaApril 23, 2015 at 6:39 PM

    Net Neutrality should not Be Abolished

    Reply
  120. amol mapariApril 23, 2015 at 6:46 PM

    No, Already all telecome company data charges are high.

    Reply
  121. ASHISH JAIMApril 23, 2015 at 6:49 PM

    NOW THESE DAYS, INTERNET CHARGES OF 3G ARE VERY HIGH FOR MIDDLE CLASS INTERNET USERS INTERNET PRICE SHOULD BE LESSER THEN NOW. INTERNET SHOULD BE REGULATED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE..

    Reply
  122. no we should have freedome to use everything on the internet

    Reply
  123. Rajiv SinhaApril 23, 2015 at 6:50 PM

    Net neutrality is very important for netizens and should not be abolished.

    Reply
  124. M.Prema SurendranathApril 23, 2015 at 6:50 PM

    We should have free approach to the internet and other access as before. Net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  125. ASHISH JAINApril 23, 2015 at 6:53 PM

    NOW THESE DAYS, INTERNET CHARGES OF 3G ARE VERY HIGH FOR MIDDLE CLASS INTERNET USERS INTERNET PRICE SHOULD BE LESSER THEN NOW. INTERNET SHOULD BE REGULATED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE

    Reply
  126. syed sajid aliApril 23, 2015 at 6:53 PM

    B) NO

    Reply
  127. I am in favour of net neurality

    Reply
  128. syed sajid aliApril 23, 2015 at 6:56 PM

    Net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  129. Sriram RavichandranApril 23, 2015 at 6:56 PM

    NET NEUTRALITY should not be abolished

    Reply
  130. NET NEURALITY SHOULD PREVAIL

    Reply
  131. syed sajid aliApril 23, 2015 at 6:57 PM

    Net neutrality should stay the same.

    Reply
  132. Dr. Sarang PhadkeApril 23, 2015 at 6:57 PM

    Should Net Neutrality Be Abolished?
    B) No

    Reply
  133. We should have net neutrality.

    Reply
  134. Sriram RavichandranApril 23, 2015 at 6:58 PM

    NET NEUTRALITY should not be abolished.And even now the data pack rates are toooo high!!

    Reply
  135. I support Net Nuterality

    Reply
  136. vinay pandeyApril 23, 2015 at 6:59 PM

    No. i am in favor of net neutrality

    Reply
  137. Jinal PanchamiaApril 23, 2015 at 7:00 PM

    No, it should not be abolished.

    Reply
  138. Promod SharmaApril 23, 2015 at 7:00 PM

    B

    Reply
  139. Dr. Sarang PhadkeApril 23, 2015 at 7:01 PM

    If net neutrality is abolished it will prove a sound step towards crony capitalism in our biggest DEMOCRACY.

    Reply
  140. ANKUSH GOYALApril 23, 2015 at 7:01 PM

    (POLE)– NO………

    NET NEUTRALITY SHOULD NOT BE ABOLISHED.

    MY FAMILY MEMBERS ARE AGAINST TO ABOLISHED THE NET NEUTRALITY.

    MY POLL:
    NO.NET NEUTRALITY SHOULD NOT BE ABOLISHED.

    Reply
  141. Net neutrality must not be abolished because it is right of every net user to surf all the sites without impairing the speed .

    Reply
  142. net for everyone..and net neutrality must not be abolished.

    Reply
  143. Net Neutrality shouldn’t abolished.
    It should be same as we’re using now.

    Reply
  144. No

    sorry for previous reply

    Reply
  145. ANIL PANDIYAApril 23, 2015 at 7:04 PM

    NOT REQURIED

    Reply
  146. Prof. C.S.KalhaApril 23, 2015 at 7:05 PM

    Big NO

    Reply
  147. Jayesh BaxiApril 23, 2015 at 7:05 PM

    NET NEUTRALITY SHOULD NEVER BE ABOLISHED & TRAI SHOULD TAKE NECESSARY STINGENT STEPS TO PREVENT IT

    Reply
  148. DK GaikwadApril 23, 2015 at 7:06 PM

    No never, Net neutrality should not abolished.

    Reply
  149. NO NOT AT ALL…

    Reply
  150. Pramod ShankhdharApril 23, 2015 at 7:08 PM

    What is stopping Mr. Ravi Shankar prasasd from expressing his views. As far as i am concerned it is a BIG ‘NO’

    Reply
  151. Shubham PrajapatiApril 23, 2015 at 7:09 PM

    Yes. I support Net Neutrality. It should be allows as a results no discrimination happening with other browser.

    Reply
  152. udipta garnaikApril 23, 2015 at 7:09 PM

    NO

    Reply
  153. Sanjeev ChauhanApril 23, 2015 at 7:09 PM

    No way it should be abolished

    Reply
  154. no it shoulnot be

    Reply
  155. its a good approach for indians

    Reply
  156. manjunathchandraApril 23, 2015 at 7:12 PM

    B) no

    Reply
  157. jitesh kakkadApril 23, 2015 at 7:13 PM

    Net Neutrality is my fundamental right. Any government trying to change it will not be able to finish its 5 year tenure.

    Don’t try to control us at each and every stage of life, already fed up with too many restrictions by government.

    We expect our prime minister to make our lives better not worst.

    Reply
  158. Tarun KumarApril 23, 2015 at 7:14 PM

    yes

    Reply
  159. NO…IT SHOULD NOT BE ABOLISHED….TRAI SHOULD BE VERY ACTIVE AND VIGILANT…IT SHOULD NEVER HAPPEN…

    Reply
  160. should not be done

    Reply
  161. kalpesh shah/suratApril 23, 2015 at 7:15 PM

    NO.A BIG NOOO,,,net nutrality shold not be abolished,it is only in favour of the telecom companies.

    Reply
  162. Veerendra UpasaniApril 23, 2015 at 7:16 PM

    NO, Net Neutrality should NOT be Abolished

    Reply
  163. no NO No…………………

    Reply
  164. Madhurima BardhanApril 23, 2015 at 7:17 PM

    NO.
    NOT AT ALL

    Reply
  165. Sanjay SharmaApril 23, 2015 at 7:19 PM

    NO

    Reply
  166. NINAD DASH1April 23, 2015 at 7:19 PM

    (B) NO #saveTheInternet

    Reply
  167. Ashish RathodApril 23, 2015 at 7:21 PM

    No, Net Neutrality should not abolished
    There must be equal right of access internet in way of speed, cost and accessibility

    Reply
  168. Suneel Babu KotaproluApril 23, 2015 at 7:21 PM

    Yes

    Reply
  169. Pradip Kumar BardhanApril 23, 2015 at 7:21 PM

    NO, absolutely not, it should not be abolished

    Reply
  170. Mridul TulsyanApril 23, 2015 at 7:22 PM

    no

    Reply
  171. Ritesh natalApril 23, 2015 at 7:22 PM

    NO

    Reply
  172. NO, it should not be abolished. this is the best possible way internet can be used. It should be equal for all. the current method should be followed, no changes are required.

    Reply
  173. No. Net neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  174. J.M.ManchandaApril 23, 2015 at 7:27 PM

    No! Equal access to all Net users is a part of the fundamental right of freedom of expression & must not be tinkered with in a democracy.

    Reply
  175. Arunesh aroraApril 23, 2015 at 7:27 PM

    No, net-nutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  176. No abolishment of Net Neutrality.

    Reply
  177. Abhishek RavalApril 23, 2015 at 7:27 PM

    NOOOOOOOOOOO……….

    Reply
  178. a big NO

    Reply
  179. Pournima ParanjpeApril 23, 2015 at 7:28 PM

    NO It shouldn’t abolished,it is right of citizen of India to surf any site on net.

    Reply
  180. sunil joshiApril 23, 2015 at 7:29 PM

    net neutrality is nessesory only for those sites netizen who have aim only sexual sites and porn sites and dirty site have access only while they pay for this types of sites until this sites not accessible.

    Reply
  181. Rajender ChukkaApril 23, 2015 at 7:29 PM

    Net speed should be same for all the sites and applications.
    Please save internet from scrupulous service providers

    Reply
  182. YES..YES

    Reply
  183. No one can compromise net neutrality

    Reply
  184. SANJIB KUMAR DASHApril 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM

    NO

    Reply
  185. NO it should not be…………

    Reply
  186. sandip idhateApril 23, 2015 at 7:36 PM

    We need to abolish te net neutrality

    Reply
  187. amit klumarApril 23, 2015 at 7:36 PM

    NO

    Reply
  188. M.P.SastryApril 23, 2015 at 7:37 PM

    NET NEUTRALITY IS MUST FOR FREEDOM OF INTERNET USERS. WITHOUT NEUTRALITY THE INTERNET IS LAME AND DUMB . BESIDES PRIVATE PARTIES TAKING ADVANTAGE GOVT WILL BLOCK MANY OF THEIR WEBSITES TO STOP FLOW OF INFORMATION WHICH EXPOSES NON TRANSPARENCY SAVING TROUBLE FROM RIGHT TO INFORMATION RTI ACT ETC.NET RESTRICTIONS WILL BAR THE EASY FREE AVAILABLE KNOWLEDGE ABOUT SEVERAL USEFUL THINGS AT CLICK OF THE MOUSE IN HOSE.WE SEE AND TALK TO OUR NEAR AND DEAR EVERY DAY IN FACE TIME & SKYPE ETC. THE IDEA TO STRIP NEUTRALITY IS A RETROGRADE STEP INTEND TO CURTAIL THE EXISTING FREEDOM OF THE INTERNET USERS FOR THEIR OWN BENEFIT .ISP PROVIDERS ARE REDUCING THE SPEED IN THE NAME OF FAIR USE POLICY.NOW THEY CAN DO WHAT EVER THEY CAN . TRI SHOULD SAVE THE INTER NET FREEDOM . HAIL NET NEUTRALITY.

    Reply
  189. Net Neutrality means last place on earth where people enjoy some freedom. so NO – net neutrality should not be abolished,in favor of citizens of India.

    Reply
  190. Subhas MitraApril 23, 2015 at 7:38 PM

    NO…IT SHOULD NOT BE ABOLISHED….TRAI SHOULD BE VERY ACTIVE AND VIGILANT…IT SHOULD NEVER HAPPEN…

    Reply
  191. Net neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  192. D. SuriyamoorthyApril 23, 2015 at 7:42 PM

    (1)The problem about net neutrality is not the jargons used to confuse common man. The problems are TRAI and the Government behind it. (2) The so-called watch-dog TRAI is just like many other regulatory bodies in India. It is suspect beyond any doubt. It will become the main culprit in the internet mafia. TRAI is born and brought up in our cultural heritage. If Government and TRAI join hands, they will entice telcos and fleece the users. (3) One glaring example: I used to pay only Rs.99 per month for a 2 GB-ULD data package for my smart phone. This was in 2012. Now in less than 2 years we are now paying close to Rs.300 for the same package. Don’t you think TRAI officials have over-eaten till their bellies burst out? Think of what havoc Airtel et al will unleash if they just get hold of what they want) (3) Government has set up many regulatory bodies ostentatiously in public interest. In reality a regularity body means a toll mafia against public interest. (4) Want an example? Drug control is such a farce. Just see how much the cost of medicines has risen in last three years. The prices have doubled. (3) Another example: A decade ago I used to pay about Rs.100 as electricity bill. Now in the name of power company (they have changed the nomenclature from Electricity Board to Power Supply Corporation) Government has hiked the charges steeply and I am now paying in excess of Rs.1500. Government continues to hike charges every year. Even if a different saintly party comes to power the new Government will not give up this tasty blood—Delhi may be an exception.

    Reply
  193. Sanjeev MishraApril 23, 2015 at 7:42 PM

    Should not be abolished.

    Reply
  194. soundara rajaApril 23, 2015 at 7:43 PM

    NssssssssssssssOsssssssssssssssssss We need freedom to choice

    Reply
  195. I strongly support Net neutrality and wish it must not be abolished. But I am afraid the policy will not be guided by the interest of the users. We may recall that earlier all bsnl users were offered 1% rebate for paying bills online. Suddenly the rebate was withdrawn and the slogan changed to ‘use ECS for hassle-free payment. I am afraid that the net neutrality will be ultimately abolished leaving aside the interest of the users. Let us strongly protest against it.

    Reply
  196. Sanjeev MishraApril 23, 2015 at 7:44 PM

    It is against natural freedom.

    Reply
  197. E PraneethApril 23, 2015 at 7:45 PM

    No, net neutrality should not be abolished as it results in paying more for certain sites and equality and easy accessibility is lost.

    Reply
  198. Biswanath AcharyaApril 23, 2015 at 7:46 PM

    No. Never. These are some dirty tactics of Business Czars. We should not succumb to this pressure. Customers of Airtel and Vodafone should protest by porting the nos to other network in large numbers to teach them a lesson.

    Reply
  199. PRADEEP GUPTAApril 23, 2015 at 7:46 PM

    A big no to all the efforts of controlling everything by Governments or private service providers. We are paying hefty amounts for net data and only we have the right to decide the kind of data we use, obviously until we are harming anybody. And net speed in India is already pathetic at no.115 (if i’m correct) in the world. Service providers and Govt. agencies should concentrate only on speeding the data transfer speeds to earn more profit. MORE DATA USED MEANS MORE MONEY TO SERVICE PROVIDERS.

    Reply
  200. NO…it shouldnt be abolished.

    Reply
  201. Net Neutrality should not be abolished. Any such move by any ISP provider reflects its monopoly attitude without considering the valued customers.

    Reply
  202. I do not understand why are people wasting their effort. I am just aware of Airtel promoting a shopping site. What is wrong with that?

    If the other sites can tie up with airtel too they will also get access to their user database. It is not public information.

    I don’t want my contact details to be published on to the internet.

    Reply
  203. NO net neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  204. Sanjeev MishraApril 23, 2015 at 7:49 PM

    Net neutality Should not be abolished.

    Reply
  205. pooja muchhalApril 23, 2015 at 7:50 PM

    Never !!
    It’s a pre requisite for a man’s survival today !
    anything worse than no internet is a SLOW INTERNET.
    Net Neutrality is the need of the hour.

    Reply
  206. NOOOOOOOOOOOO…no one should be allowed to ever get this topic again…NET should be neutral to all…

    Reply
  207. Tamkeen AhmadApril 23, 2015 at 7:53 PM

    It will not be free information and if the Airtel and Vodafone policy goes through. such a policy which blocks information is not going to work for any good in India

    Reply
  208. umme salmaApril 23, 2015 at 7:53 PM

    No,it should not be abolished.

    Reply
  209. umme salmaApril 23, 2015 at 7:55 PM

    No, it should not be abolished

    Reply
  210. India is a bloody corrupt country. I don’t see us prospering even if we retain Net Neutrality. ISPs are already spying on us and selling private info.

    Reply
  211. No, it should be implemented as quickly as possible……

    Reply
  212. A BIG “NO”

    Reply
  213. Rajat Saran LalApril 23, 2015 at 7:59 PM

    No, the net neutrality should not be abolished. Every citizen should have have a right to use it with any discrimination.

    Reply
  214. No! net neutrality shouldnot be abolished!!!!!

    Reply
  215. Rajat Saran LalApril 23, 2015 at 8:00 PM

    No, the net neutrality should not be abolished. Every citizen should have a right to use it with any discrimination.

    Reply
  216. Shoba SomanApril 23, 2015 at 8:01 PM

    NO.NO.NO.

    Reply
  217. NOT AT ALL.

    Reply
  218. Net is basic requirement so it should be nutrient.

    Reply
  219. kishori prasadApril 23, 2015 at 8:02 PM

    even developed countries like USA have reverted to net neutrality. for promotion and spread of net use by all and sundry net neutrality should continue.

    Reply
  220. mohanshyamkhandelwalApril 23, 2015 at 8:05 PM

    NO It shouldn’t abolished,it is right of citizen of India to surf any site on net.
    Net speed should be same for all the sites and applications.
    Please save internet from scrupulous service providers

    Reply
  221. Col Pradip MitraApril 23, 2015 at 8:06 PM

    Certainly not. Every individual should have access to all websites and information and should be able to freely communicate the same. You cannot trample with individual freedom. In other words you are suppressing news and views of individuals and organisations. That is no solution to the problems we are facing.

    Reply
  222. NO,NET NUTRELITY should not be abolished
    NO FREAKIN WAY

    Reply
  223. No

    Reply
  224. harshad ElkunchwarApril 23, 2015 at 8:08 PM

    No, Net neutrality should not be abolished. we all should have free and equal access to the Internet. #savetheinternet

    Reply
  225. Dr. Mohammad Aslam AnsariApril 23, 2015 at 8:08 PM

    Net neutrality should not be abolished. It will like dividing the netizens into rich and poor; only corporates/ business houses/ ISPs will be gaining, and the biggest looser will be the net user.

    Reply
  226. Prabal PalApril 23, 2015 at 8:08 PM

    A BIG “NO”

    Reply
  227. NO,SAVE THE INTERNET,#save #netneutrality

    Reply
  228. No, ISPs need to treat all data equally

    Reply
  229. Parichay PariApril 23, 2015 at 8:10 PM

    NO.

    Reply
  230. Dr Manish BohraApril 23, 2015 at 8:10 PM

    No it should not be abolished. it will be a great cheating with the internet users. people of India should strongly oppose the abolishment of net neutrality.

    Reply
  231. no, net neutrality sholud be maintained.

    Reply
  232. Tank VijayApril 23, 2015 at 8:12 PM

    It was so Important for all those people who use the internet.
    we all who has use internet with this fite.
    its to important for all of us.
    so I Request to all of people who know abot this fite plz give your poll i may be chenge the next World.

    Reply
  233. Sanjay MulikApril 23, 2015 at 8:12 PM

    No. Free and equal right to INTERNET access to all is required.

    Reply
  234. yes net nutrality should be practised

    Reply
  235. NO, NET NEUTRALITY SHOULD NOT BE ABOLISHED..

    Reply
  236. Saurabh ShindeApril 23, 2015 at 8:16 PM

    NO net neutrality should not be abolished. As a user its our right to surf whatever we wish for, its our right to freedom…

    Reply
  237. rajesh RamaniApril 23, 2015 at 8:17 PM

    No

    Reply
  238. Never! There should be net neutrality!
    Living in a free democratic country, internet should be neutral. It’s as if our right is snatched away from us!

    Reply
  239. I think the internet is a good educational tool and needs to be available for one and all not just for the previlleged few. Hence a big NO.

    Reply
  240. Mohsin BelalApril 23, 2015 at 8:20 PM

    No. Never
    Its like a British policy ” Divide and Rule ” on internet users.

    Reply
  241. Net Neutrality must NOT Be Abolished

    Reply
  242. kumarapoorv0409April 23, 2015 at 8:22 PM

    no

    Reply
  243. Save the Internet Vote for Net Neutrality.

    Reply
  244. Arvind TangadiApril 23, 2015 at 8:24 PM

    No, Net neutrality should not be abolished. there must be free and equal access to the users of Internet.

    Reply
  245. Kunal GuptaApril 23, 2015 at 8:25 PM

    No, Net Neutrality should not be abolished!

    Reply
  246. NO! IT SHOULD NOT ABOLISHED…

    Reply
  247. net neutrality is like d fundamental rights of every citizen of our country. It is and should remain equal 4 each & every people. Some profit minded companies r trying 2 rob us gain using our helplessness. PLZ raise ur voice aganist it. Ur vote may be important.

    Reply
  248. hitanshu PanchalApril 23, 2015 at 8:26 PM

    Net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  249. Dattatray Bhimaji KulkarniApril 23, 2015 at 8:26 PM

    No

    Reply
  250. Yes

    Reply
  251. Jayprakash JoshiApril 23, 2015 at 8:27 PM

    No, Net Neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  252. No net neutrality should not be abolished as it will hamper innovation.

    Reply
  253. Net neutrality is an ABSOLUTE NECESSITY. We cannot hope for a better future and enhancement in technology without it.

    Reply
  254. Kushal GangopadhyayApril 23, 2015 at 8:29 PM

    No, no, no, no, NOOOOOOOOO….

    Reply
  255. Net neutrality has to be ensured for all users. However moderation of the comments should continue to not allow filthy abuses.

    Reply
  256. omesh vermaApril 23, 2015 at 8:30 PM

    Internet must must must be free of such pressure of big players who seek only big profit by hook or by crook. So, net users must poll against the boundations to be put on net neutrality. I say big NO. iNTERNET MUST HAVE FREEDOM LIKE PRESS. This type of game was played by big players on TV also. As, paid and non paid channels were introduced to viewers in the name of digital signals. Due to some tv channels greed, tv watching is going more and more costlier. Same situation would be with internet surfing. Popular and non popular websites will be there in future, and operators will make huge profits.
    So say no.

    Reply
  257. Rajiv Ranjan SharmaApril 23, 2015 at 8:31 PM

    “No”, Net Neutrality should not be abolished. And for all motherF*&%#@* who said Yes, I want to ask did they understand the meaning of Net Neutrality. All who said “Yes” are assh@#$ motherF*&%#@*.

    Reply
  258. No, Net Neutrality should not be abolished. If abolished then I don’t think there will be anybody who feels like paying different rates for the same milk (according to the usage) If you feel like making tea then milk costs 50/ltr, If you wanna make milk shake then cost is 70/ltr, if hot coffee then cost is 60/ltr, if cold coffee then cost is 90/ltr……..for curd 110/ltr…… Its not fare….I am against it.

    Reply
  259. Chandresh MehtaApril 23, 2015 at 8:32 PM

    Of course NO.

    Reply
  260. Vijayraj BhosaleApril 23, 2015 at 8:33 PM

    No.
    Net neutrality should not be abolished, as it is required for free and fair growth of Internet in country like India. Still lot of people do not have access to Internet.

    Reply
  261. VISHWAS SOMPURAApril 23, 2015 at 8:33 PM

    NO

    Reply
  262. Manoranjan SarkarApril 23, 2015 at 8:34 PM

    No. Net Neutrality is must for every country.

    Reply
  263. Save the internet, pure and simple..

    Reply
  264. Rohit KumarApril 23, 2015 at 8:36 PM

    Net Neutrality should not be abolished as it is important for a developing country.

    Reply
  265. Sapan LoyalkaApril 23, 2015 at 8:36 PM

    No Net Neutrality should not be abolished at all.

    Reply
  266. Vikas LuthraApril 23, 2015 at 8:37 PM

    no, Net neutrality should not be abolished. we all should have free and equal access to the Internet.savetheinternet

    Reply
  267. Swami NishchalanandApril 23, 2015 at 8:38 PM

    No, Net neutrality should not be abolished. there must be free and equal access to the users of Internet. #savetheinternet

    Reply
  268. Yogendra SinghApril 23, 2015 at 8:38 PM

    No………………

    A big Noooooooooooooooooo

    Reply
  269. umaima khanApril 23, 2015 at 8:38 PM

    Net Neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  270. Arun Kumar DeyApril 23, 2015 at 8:40 PM

    Equalization must be given priority. So “Net Neutrality” should not be abolished.

    Reply
  271. No net neutrality should not be abolished. each and everyone should get free and fast internet. #savetheinternet

    Reply
  272. NO . i support the net

    Reply
  273. Prashant MoreApril 23, 2015 at 8:42 PM

    Certainly Not.

    Reply
  274. I WILL SUPPORT THE NET NEUTRALITY

    Reply
  275. No. freedom of expression on net to be protected

    Reply
  276. Arun Kumar DeyApril 23, 2015 at 8:45 PM

    No. “Net Neutrality” should not be abolished. Equalization must be given priority to every intended user.

    Reply
  277. tanvi guptaApril 23, 2015 at 8:46 PM

    No,net neutrality should not be abolished,every one should have access to Internet at d same speeds

    Reply
  278. Kushal BharambeApril 23, 2015 at 8:47 PM

    NO, it should not be abolished Net Neutrality is our Right…..

    Reply
  279. Vijayalakshmi K.April 23, 2015 at 8:47 PM

    No! #SavetheInternet #MakeIndiaDevelop

    Reply
  280. Jitender KumarApril 23, 2015 at 8:48 PM

    Net neutrality should not be abolished.
    It must be our right to use internet as per our choice and no extra fee should be there for any particular website.

    Reply
  281. No, net neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  282. NO.

    Reply
  283. NO.

    Net neutrality should not be aboloished.

    if this is abolished then in future they may ask for additional payment of each and every sites (not only few )that we access more number of times.

    If they still want to do away with net neutrality then they should not have any internet or broad band plans.

    Today they want addtional payment for watsapp, skype, facebook, online business sites such as flipkart, amazon, etc. Tomorrow they may even ask for additinal payment for browsing bank, railway, govt portals etc as these are browsed regularly.

    Reply
  284. bharat shrimankerApril 23, 2015 at 8:50 PM

    no

    Reply
  285. M N PoddarApril 23, 2015 at 8:51 PM

    I strongly support net neutrality. Net neutrality must be ensured by all players in the field and protected by the regulator and government.No politics in this.

    Reply
  286. vivek raj guptaApril 23, 2015 at 8:52 PM

    NO

    Reply
  287. Najam DeshmukhApril 23, 2015 at 8:53 PM

    No. Absolutely not. Net has to be kept neutral since its the only medium in exsistence today.

    Reply
  288. samir barikApril 23, 2015 at 8:54 PM

    no

    Reply
  289. Ajeet BergaleyApril 23, 2015 at 8:54 PM

    NO

    Reply
  290. No net neutrality

    Reply
  291. No. Equality is always the best.

    Reply
  292. Bhavesh AroraApril 23, 2015 at 8:59 PM

    not at all . internet is a place where everyone is equal .

    Reply
  293. NO.net neutrality should be abolished

    Reply
  294. No it should not be abolished

    Reply
  295. Rahul AlmightyApril 23, 2015 at 9:02 PM

    No

    Reply
  296. No, not to be abolished.

    Reply
  297. Gautam SinghApril 23, 2015 at 9:03 PM

    Net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  298. Kanhu AcharyApril 23, 2015 at 9:04 PM

    Net Neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  299. Ashoka sethApril 23, 2015 at 9:05 PM

    No. Net neutrality should be maintained. Once you allow it to be infringed on any excuse, it will be very difficult to restore it.

    Reply
  300. Aparnita BhattacharjeeApril 23, 2015 at 9:06 PM

    No, Net Neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  301. NO way!!! If it’ll get abolished, there will b a massive series protests all over the country. #Support_Net_Neutrality

    Reply
  302. Faith RaglandApril 23, 2015 at 9:06 PM

    No

    Reply
  303. Dipta Bhanu Ghosh DastiderApril 23, 2015 at 9:11 PM

    Definitely ……. A safe Network required to each Human Beings …… (y)

    Reply
  304. Should NEVER be abolished

    Reply
  305. I am completely in favor of net neutrality. Internet and its services are a necessity, we should have free access to it. Free internet can foster innovation and hence net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  306. Sateesh Kumar MekapatiApril 23, 2015 at 9:24 PM

    Net neutrality should not be abolished. We all should have the right to use the net as we are using now.

    Reply
  307. Net neutrality is similar to Democracy. To stop neutrality is nothing but posing hindrance to the users. TRAI should not accept the profiteering attitude of the service providing companies.

    Reply
    • Suraj GuptaApril 24, 2015 at 10:44 AM

      information has been one of the hope for bridging inequality and making better choices of life, the information is by choice and not by compulsion , so let it remain that way.

      Reply
  308. anilkumar.sApril 23, 2015 at 9:32 PM

    the answer to the question is a big No, the net neturality must be kept intact…Already service providers in the names of various services have been looting mobile users.. this will only add to it..the TRAI must behave to what it has been formed..not to dance in tune with service providers..

    Reply
  309. Hemang ModiApril 23, 2015 at 9:34 PM

    NO

    Reply
  310. Vaseem AnsariApril 23, 2015 at 9:36 PM

    I am for Net Neutrality till it does not hurt someones religious feelings.Sanctum sanctorum of the religious persons and places should be up holed.

    Reply
  311. What government should do is tax us for each grain of food we eat, each cubic cm of air we inhale, each gram of water we consume. its like going out with a knife and stabbing people in the face. the only good thing, where people can express their opinions and experience freedom, you want to take that away. You want to become rich.. go out daku style, with a government’s party symbol on.

    ABOLISHING NET NEUTRALITY IS THEIR WAY OF SHOWING SUPERIORITY!! #savetheinternet

    Reply
  312. Shashank NApril 23, 2015 at 9:37 PM

    NO…… net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  313. No, net neutrality

    Reply
  314. Net neutrality should not be abolished. we all should have free and equal access to the Internet.

    Reply
  315. nandakumarApril 23, 2015 at 9:41 PM

    No. Net Neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  316. Ashok BhagatApril 23, 2015 at 9:42 PM

    No, Net neutrality should not be abolished. there must be free and equal access to the users of Internet. savetheinternet

    Reply
  317. Mr. MandalApril 23, 2015 at 9:42 PM

    No. We need equality in internet.

    Reply
  318. bajirao bapurao chavanApril 23, 2015 at 9:44 PM

    NO

    Reply
  319. Hiten ShahApril 23, 2015 at 9:45 PM

    NO

    Reply
  320. hell no..we need freedom to visit any site we want ..if nt abolished thn no use of internet

    Reply
  321. I am not in favor of abolishing net neutrality.

    Reply
  322. NO, NO, NO….internet is Air for us 🙂

    Reply
  323. No, this is bullshit.
    its equivalent of taking away the fundamental right given by our constitution.
    and we are born free and shall live free. BJP government cant decide which air we shall breath.

    Reply
  324. Harsh PatelApril 23, 2015 at 9:52 PM

    No

    Reply
  325. Rajesh Kumar KapilaApril 23, 2015 at 9:55 PM

    No Never

    Reply
  326. Kapil GuptaApril 23, 2015 at 9:55 PM

    HELL NO MAN
    THE NET SHOULD REMAIN NEUTRAL
    ITS THE ONLY PLACE WITHOUT RACISM AND DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RICH AND POOR
    EVERYONE IS EQUALL

    Reply
  327. No, it should not be abolished.

    Reply
  328. No,Net Neutrality should not be abolished,everyone must have equal rights.
    #TRAI Don’t Even TRY

    Reply
  329. Net must be neutral, always & every time

    Reply
  330. Raj pillaiApril 23, 2015 at 9:58 PM

    No. Internet has basic amenities to every common man. So the NET NEUTRALITY should not be abolished.

    Reply
  331. Mahesh IyerApril 23, 2015 at 9:59 PM

    Those who all said yes….. do u guys even know what net neutrality is….. Please…… net neutrality should not be abolished at any cost….. Everyone who has an internet connection should have complete access over anything on the internet without any partiality for any websites….

    Reply
  332. Internet Neutrality is like a freedom of surfing on internet no one should dare not to snatch it from us at any cost.

    Reply
  333. No, it should not be abolished.Everyone should be able to use the internet without any discrimination.

    Reply
  334. Nishant PatelApril 23, 2015 at 10:05 PM

    No………..

    Reply
  335. No net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  336. CS RadhakrishnanApril 23, 2015 at 10:07 PM

    NO – net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  337. CS RadhakrishnanApril 23, 2015 at 10:09 PM

    Govt should regulate.

    Reply
  338. no net neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  339. NET IS BASIC NECESSITY AND IS MUST FOR COMPLEX ENVIRONMENT LIKE OUR’S COUNTRY INDIA.
    INTERNET SHOULD BE AVAILABLE WITHOUTANY LIMITS.

    Reply
  340. Munish GoyalApril 23, 2015 at 10:12 PM

    Yes

    Reply
  341. no.. net neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  342. Vijay Badgujar, AdvocateApril 23, 2015 at 10:15 PM

    We must have free access of internet. If TRAI HAS power to restrict access of internet I request you to block all the porn website in India.

    No single porn site should be allowed over the internet. If Government can block the access to porn sites, it will save the bright future of India. Now a days I observe that even the children of 5 to 15 years having the smart phone and because of no restriction on accessing porn sites the children start accessing these sites and gets addicted to watch the porn sites on regular basis. Therefore there must be restriction on accessing these sites only.

    Reply
  343. Rama Murthy PBVApril 23, 2015 at 10:16 PM

    No, Net neutrality should not be abolished. there must be free and equal access to the users of Internet. save the internet

    Reply
  344. Emphatic NO. Net neutrality should NOT be abolished. It should be open to all and no controls whatsoever be in place.

    Reply
  345. neelmani desaiApril 23, 2015 at 10:19 PM

    No, net neutrality is needed.

    Reply
  346. Dlpak K GhoshApril 23, 2015 at 10:20 PM

    Internet neutrality must not be abolished.

    Reply
  347. neelmani desaiApril 23, 2015 at 10:22 PM

    net neutrality is needed.

    Reply
  348. NO, do not abolish net neutrality. Internet should remain unbound and open to all.

    Reply
  349. Purvak JainApril 23, 2015 at 10:24 PM

    No

    Reply
  350. Sumit ChatterjeeApril 23, 2015 at 10:28 PM

    STRONGLY DISAGREE
    EVERY ORGANISATION SHOULD BE OPT OUT.
    IT’S A TRICK OF THE PROVIDERS.

    Reply
  351. Archis BhideApril 23, 2015 at 10:29 PM

    NO #saveinternet

    Reply
  352. Aryama MandalApril 23, 2015 at 10:29 PM

    No. Net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  353. Vikas SathiyaiApril 23, 2015 at 10:29 PM

    NO.Net Neutrality should not be abolished at all. All Indians should have equal access to net.

    Reply
  354. rakesh deahmukhApril 23, 2015 at 10:30 PM

    No it will be bad ifect

    Reply
  355. NO …..there should be net neutrality

    Reply
  356. a big NO! For the big companies those who strive to gain max. control over the internet market, should realise that abolishing net neutrality is not going to make them insurmountable. The largest democracy for which India is known throughout world should think on same track then to make it complex and business driven. Internet is a service by telecom companies through TRAI not a profit making idea..

    Reply
  357. Kailash BargeApril 23, 2015 at 10:35 PM

    BIG NO

    Reply
  358. Not at all.

    Reply
  359. No

    Reply
  360. No, net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  361. No, Net neutrality should not be abolished. there must be free and equal access to the users of Internet. savetheinternet

    Reply
  362. Ranjit SwainApril 23, 2015 at 10:39 PM

    NO.

    Reply
  363. Ravi PatnaikApril 23, 2015 at 10:40 PM

    NO. Net Neutrality must NOT be abolished.

    Reply
  364. Samuel StephenApril 23, 2015 at 10:48 PM

    NO

    Reply
  365. kalpesh patilApril 23, 2015 at 10:50 PM

    YES

    Reply
  366. No. Net neutrality should NOT be abolished.

    Reply
  367. No, Net neutrality should not be abolished. there must be free and equal access to the Internet.

    Reply
  368. NO. Net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  369. No. It shouldn’t be abolished.

    Reply
  370. Kaushik AsharApril 23, 2015 at 10:53 PM

    No, Net neutrality should not be abolished we should all have equal access to internet.

    Reply
  371. vinod k aroraApril 23, 2015 at 10:53 PM

    I am all for net neutrality and it must be preserved. Entities must not be allowed to act to the detriment of the common user. There is no need to frame any law as it would amount to have some sort of bias or otherwise which the law would be meant for.

    Reply
  372. srinivas kcApril 23, 2015 at 10:59 PM

    NO
    I am completely against new neutrality, its like being in prison .

    some people said YES , i wish they soon .

    Reply
  373. No,did not abolished Net Neutrality

    Reply
  374. Sanjib PaulApril 23, 2015 at 11:01 PM

    Never, Net neutrality should never be abolished. there should be uniform and equal access to the users of Internet. Save-the-Internet.

    Reply
  375. No

    Reply
  376. Faizulraza VakilApril 23, 2015 at 11:05 PM

    Net neutrality should not be abolished.
    THERE MUST BE EQUAL ACCESIBLITY OF NET TO EVERYONE IN TERMS OF SPEED AND COSTING

    Reply
  377. Ajinkya KambleApril 23, 2015 at 11:06 PM

    NO

    Reply
  378. A.G.ChowdhuryApril 23, 2015 at 11:08 PM

    NO

    Reply
  379. Net neutrality is essential for various reasons.Abolishing net neutrality will be a retrograde step in denying you, all the benefits on information highway. Detrimental to development.

    Reply
  380. KULDEEP GHILDIYALApril 23, 2015 at 11:10 PM

    No Organization or anyone above the Govt since govt makes the rule, If Govt is willing to do something no one can stop him
    India must adhere to the principle of Net Neutrality and for this Trai and telecom Minister minister must play an honest role
    Why the ISP want to earn money from user since they are already paying bill for it and ISP can earn money through ads

    Reply
  381. NET NEUTRALITY SHOULD NOT BE ABOLISHED

    Reply
  382. दामोदर दस गोयलApril 23, 2015 at 11:15 PM

    No abolishment of Net Neutrality. Please save internet from scrupulous service providers.

    Reply
  383. दामोदर दास गोयलApril 23, 2015 at 11:15 PM

    No abolishment of Net Neutrality.

    Reply
  384. Rounak Madhav KhareApril 23, 2015 at 11:16 PM

    yes it should be same for all + the internet speed e.g 21mbps on 3g you advertise having full range, atlest provide 12mbps properly.

    Reply
  385. A K ChakrabortyApril 23, 2015 at 11:22 PM

    No. Atleast the cyberworld should be flat.

    Reply
  386. Nishant Prasad KanthApril 23, 2015 at 11:29 PM

    NO #savetheinternet

    Reply
  387. Net neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  388. vishwajeet dasApril 23, 2015 at 11:34 PM

    No, Net neutrality should not be abolished. there must be free and equal access to the users of Internet. savetheinternet

    Reply
  389. absolutely not , it should’t be abolished , but i can say that the companies
    who are going to implement it should be heavely penalised .

    Reply
  390. its a stupid thing.wnt to abolish this net neutrality

    Reply
  391. NO, A BIG NO!!!

    Reply
  392. Ashish GoswamiApril 23, 2015 at 11:50 PM

    Hi,
    As very rightly said by
    C. Darwin, “it not that one who is the strongest will only survive, but one who is the most adaptable to the change will !!”
    In this era of 4G, discussion on net neutrality is quite good indication that some thing is going to be good, at the same time something is going to abolish or disappear too.
    Now the question is, As a developed brain we should try to preserve all the good quality from current generation. I am firm believer that if we talk about the net neutrality, this will happen forcefully or willingly. but i am writing this message with this intention that atleast my words somewhere may counts.
    first we should ask some questions to ourself before making some policy :-
    Whom we are going to provide benefit.
    A. End user -who are going to surf Internet to complete his education assignment, or a person who are taking reference from Internet, social media or a person who surf Internet to watch pornography or otherwise.
    B. ISP :- who is providing net pack, due to some applications developer build some utility where his profit margin goes sunk.
    C. To On-line community/Sites :- who have build Internet as a business platform.
    If we consider all three equally, it is quite a challenging task, in my opinion if we consider enduser gets benefit , surely this will not be a win-win position with ISP.
    Where as If we think about ISP that mean this platform would be going to most avoidable media in future just like that people still don’t want to watch movie with full commercial adds.
    if we consider that online sites goes benefited that mean somewhere we are not giving a fair deal to ISP.
    I believe, thing were use as percentile basic we should first make classification to our Internet media like education, social, informative, business, business information, online site, social chatting, pornography etc and all.
    Internet domain provider should gives percentile revenue to ISP. Like if my site is listed as education/information site it should not be a chargeable. that mean No profit No charge but if my site is build for on-line shopping or something for profit making via internet, My domain provider will take certain charge from me and domain provider give this profit sharing with ISP.
    If visitor surf Internet for chatting and social media sharing or something else. charge would be cut from his Internet- monthly bill or bundles.

    I hope this would become a stage of equality. And here the biggest challenge is classification of a site. but now a days we have developed a certain software to auto classify the site from server
    Site those are not belong to India. ISP should allow only once they are agree to give percentile share to India.

    regards

    Reply
  393. Dr D G BhosleApril 24, 2015 at 12:01 AM

    Net neutrality should be there. otherwise the ISP providers will strong arm the users.

    Just one example. earlier a monthly 3G net pack of vodaphone was for 30 days. Later they made it for 28 days. So 2 days for each month equals to 24 days and there are 7 months that have 31 days so that makes 7 days. the calculation is 24+7 =31. So they have squeezed one full months subscription by this single measure.

    Reply
  394. Deepak SinghApril 24, 2015 at 12:04 AM

    Net neutrality is thefting the right of poor people they can’t pay that much amount for using different service,so my point of view “NO”

    Reply
  395. TANMOY BISWASApril 24, 2015 at 12:08 AM

    NO

    Reply
  396. Biplob SheeApril 24, 2015 at 12:09 AM

    Simply NO.

    Net Neutrality Should Not Be Abolished.

    Reply
  397. NO net neutrality should not be abolished. it is totally against normal life of people. it is in same way that you are asking people to live without water.

    Reply
  398. D. DasguptaApril 24, 2015 at 12:13 AM

    No more discrimination – Net Neutrality is our right and should not be abolished.

    Reply
  399. Prakrat GuptaApril 24, 2015 at 12:14 AM

    No net net neutrality shouldn’t be abolished because this would result in a high expenditure on net by a common man.

    Reply
  400. DHRITIMAN BHATTACHARYAApril 24, 2015 at 12:16 AM

    NO

    Reply
  401. no, net neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  402. No…. Why should any ISP ban us from our right that is right of knowledge.. .Senetence Is Clear We want net neautrality

    Reply
  403. rajesh karpeApril 24, 2015 at 12:30 AM

    no

    Reply
  404. SAMIR CHATTERJEEApril 24, 2015 at 12:36 AM

    Sites which are detrimental to the society and provoke people to do decadent culture,sexual offence,violence or games which are linked to violence affect on children’s brain should be chargeable. Other than these sort of sites all other sites should be keep open for all as it is now(net neutrality).

    Reply
  405. I support net neutrality….It should not be abolish. Its our fair right to view any web contain.

    Reply
  406. Sagar KapoorApril 24, 2015 at 12:39 AM

    No it should not be abolished

    Reply
  407. Ali Shabbir HussainApril 24, 2015 at 12:40 AM

    Yes

    Reply
  408. DharmeshkumarApril 24, 2015 at 12:41 AM

    The net resources becomes very limited because of day by day increase in unclassified usage of internet in every talk of Life. It led us toward the requirement of applying some constraint or led us to learn towards classified utilization of net. Even not taking this idealism in to mind, one has to accept the real fact that we all leaving in the commercial world, and all the way our life is un-detachable with money affection. So rule remains as, “Pay more to get Batter”. My answer is, “Yes”. Thank you.

    Reply
  409. no …..absolutely no no no

    Reply
  410. no no no

    Reply
  411. Anuj JaiswalApril 24, 2015 at 1:13 AM

    No, it is general right for each user.

    Reply
  412. hoshang dasturApril 24, 2015 at 1:21 AM

    No NN should not be abolished. SW39

    Reply
  413. NO #savetheinternet

    Reply
  414. Amulya Kumar SahooApril 24, 2015 at 1:29 AM

    NO … #SaveTheInternet #NetNeutrality

    Reply
  415. Lalit MoharanaApril 24, 2015 at 1:36 AM

    No

    Reply
  416. Hari Narayan JhaApril 24, 2015 at 1:37 AM

    The net what we get something like Ticket in Black at last moment outside of Cinema Hall. If we recharge of low net plan gets poor spped of net. If we recharge of high plan we get moderate speed. If we use net from our main account balance, it seems to getting 4G speed. This is really ridiculous. We should protest this. We should stop to abolish net neutrality. We should move ahead to get our right.

    Reply
  417. NO No No

    Reply
  418. KARAN SHAHApril 24, 2015 at 1:52 AM

    YES

    Reply
  419. KARAN SHAHApril 24, 2015 at 1:53 AM

    NO NO NO NO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  420. SAJITH GOPALANApril 24, 2015 at 2:21 AM

    NO

    Reply
  421. chaithanyaApril 24, 2015 at 2:35 AM

    No, should not be abolish

    Reply
  422. Arjun SinhaApril 24, 2015 at 3:21 AM

    No. Net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  423. Sujay BhattacharyaApril 24, 2015 at 3:35 AM

    NO. Net Neutrality should remain. In India speed is already low, we hardly achieve 2 Mbps. Abolishing Net Neutrality will further reduce the speed. Nobody would like to ride a bullock cart when electric train is available. And every one should be treated equally to travel in electric train.

    Reply
  424. No, Net Neutrality should not be abolsihed. Full Internet should be available to all without any pre-judice.

    Reply
  425. Ajeetsingh RawatApril 24, 2015 at 4:50 AM

    No, It should not be abolished….

    Reply
  426. NO internet needs to remain neutral & free from organisational controls

    Reply
  427. SURESH ACHARIApril 24, 2015 at 5:02 AM

    I am in favour of net neutrality.

    Reply
  428. SURESH ACHARIApril 24, 2015 at 5:03 AM

    I am in favour of net neutrality….

    Reply
  429. NO. Net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  430. Anand BurmanApril 24, 2015 at 5:19 AM

    Net neutrality should not be abolished. there must be free and equal access to the users of Internet

    Reply
  431. prabaakaranApril 24, 2015 at 5:32 AM

    no,N.N SHOULD NOT ABOLISHED.

    Reply
  432. prabaakaranApril 24, 2015 at 5:33 AM

    NO.SHOULD NOT ABOLISHED

    Reply
  433. prasadganjiApril 24, 2015 at 6:00 AM

    stop net-neutrality. must be abolished this type of system in india now and in future.

    Reply
  434. RAVI SINGHApril 24, 2015 at 6:10 AM

    seriously it would be a biggg “NO”.

    Reply
  435. Narender Kumar KhuranaApril 24, 2015 at 6:16 AM

    Net Neutrality should be maintained at every cost. Net will become fiefdom of a selected few if the service providers play with it for money. Everybody should live and die for net neutrality.

    Reply
  436. Nisar SiddiquiApril 24, 2015 at 6:36 AM

    Net neutrality must be maintained.

    Reply
  437. gchandramohanApril 24, 2015 at 6:36 AM

    Net neutrality can be the right for netizens of india!@ GCHANDRAMOHAN

    Reply
  438. Madhav KumthekarApril 24, 2015 at 6:43 AM

    NO NO NO

    Reply
  439. no, net neutrality should not be abolished…….

    Reply
  440. Should not be abolished.
    Net neutrality is a must.

    Reply
  441. No, Net neutrality will not be abolish, because if it will be abolished the information highway would be divided into low end and high end, which is very dangerous in long run.

    Reply
  442. no it should not be abolished… we want our right to use internet in ehatsoever way we want to….. 🙂

    Reply
  443. Pandurang KonnurApril 24, 2015 at 7:19 AM

    Net neutrality should be maintained. Please save internet from scrupulous service providers.

    Reply
  444. Net neutrality is important and we must admit that internet has no one’s control and if it happens then internet would become just like a DTH cable . So i am in the favour that net should be and always be neutral

    Reply
  445. sitakanta sahuApril 24, 2015 at 7:27 AM

    Yes

    Reply
  446. Dr Anup GuptaApril 24, 2015 at 7:32 AM

    NO

    It should never be abolished.
    Let not others lead me to a particular direction
    Let be test the unknown,untested.
    Don’t make it difficult for me.

    Anup Gupta

    Reply
  447. lakshmi kanta hatuiApril 24, 2015 at 7:33 AM

    no

    Reply
  448. Gajanan TondaleApril 24, 2015 at 7:38 AM

    No..
    Internet should have freedom.

    Reply
  449. Rajendra TardeApril 24, 2015 at 7:40 AM

    No, it shouldn’t be.

    Reply
  450. no,it should be equal priority

    Reply
  451. Sanjay R NaikApril 24, 2015 at 7:44 AM

    NO – Net neutrality should not be abolished.
    The move by Telcos is but monopolistic. The consumer should remain supreme, not the Service Provider.
    This proposed move by the Telcos is akin to our Government till the late 1980s, which would levy license fees on just about everything, from radios to TVs to fax.
    As such Consumers since the advent of PCs, Windows, Mobile have been virtually choked in the stranglehold of the Companies, in one form or the other. We deal with proprietary platforms which prevent migration, difficulties in cross-platform integration, hardware that run on proprietary software and that are rendered obsolete at a unreasonable pace. These are concerns that we have been taking in our stride.
    However, compromising net neutrality attacks freedom of choice after having made a choice of Service Provider. This is a diabolical move!

    Reply
  452. HARDIK JOSHIApril 24, 2015 at 7:48 AM

    Net Neutrality should not be abolished .

    Reply
  453. Internet is like resources as of mother earth every one gets water, air, sun without discrimination like wise the access of the net should be deformed by use of might or money power!

    Reply
  454. Mac Arthur JamesApril 24, 2015 at 7:54 AM

    No, Net neutrality should not be abolished. we all should have free and equal access to the Internet.

    Reply
  455. Bhola keshariApril 24, 2015 at 8:00 AM

    no…it should not be abolished

    Reply
  456. net neutrality should not be abolished. if it is abolished it violates our freedom of choice.

    Reply
  457. DeepainderApril 24, 2015 at 8:06 AM

    No, it should not happen. These companies are earning more than enough and how much more profit they want.

    Reply
  458. Dr. Sanjay UpadhyeApril 24, 2015 at 8:08 AM

    NET should be like Electricity. Let customer decide to use it as per his own need.
    Let me hire a Taxi and Let me deicide where to take it. Taxi Driver will just provide service and need not decide my destination.
    Dr. Sanjay Upadhye

    Reply
  459. No.
    just leave the net as it is and it will be fine. Why did the debate of Net neutrality arise in the first place? Greed.Greed Greed.

    Airtel & Vodafone wanted more money as their services like chargeable SMS, Chargeable roaming, preposterous 3G charges but delivering less than 2G speeds… all these take a hit.

    LEAVE THE INTERNET ALONE

    Reply
  460. Mahesh YadavApril 24, 2015 at 8:11 AM

    A Big No. I am in the favour of Net Neutrality

    Reply
  461. Anoop ChaudharyApril 24, 2015 at 8:12 AM

    “FREE” means ‘freedom’.

    You must have freedom over the internet.

    I am in the support of net neutrality. There should be equal access for every sites. I’ll definitely not pay for which are not under plan.

    Reply
  462. Sanjay KumarApril 24, 2015 at 8:14 AM

    No, I strongly against this.get well soon ISP provider!!!!

    Reply
  463. No…It should not be aboloshed….TRAI must act in the interest of public and not the corporates…..

    Reply
  464. Malwinder SinghApril 24, 2015 at 8:23 AM

    No, because it is also a right to freedom.

    Reply
  465. Rajesh DabasApril 24, 2015 at 8:23 AM

    Net Neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  466. soutreyo sahaApril 24, 2015 at 8:24 AM

    no….it should not be abolished.
    #savetheinternet

    Reply
  467. A Strict NO..NOT AT ALL.

    Reply
  468. no we need net neutrality…………..

    Reply
  469. Prafullchandra KamathApril 24, 2015 at 8:26 AM

    Net neutrality is essential for the citizens to have easy and speedy access to information and remain well informed to take a valued decision.

    Reply
  470. K C GangadharApril 24, 2015 at 8:26 AM

    NO. Net neutrality should continue as hitherto. Give the Telcoms an inch today and you will soon find your whole freedom to browse the net gone. No way.

    Reply
  471. Jyoti KamathApril 24, 2015 at 8:27 AM

    I am for net neutrality to keep abrest of the things happening around.

    Reply
  472. Abdur RahmanApril 24, 2015 at 8:30 AM

    No. Let’s not fall pray in the hands of service providers.

    Reply
  473. jagroshan singhApril 24, 2015 at 8:30 AM

    no, it should not be abolished

    Reply
  474. Rohit MillnsApril 24, 2015 at 8:31 AM

    NO, it should not be abolished

    Reply
  475. Yash KachaApril 24, 2015 at 8:31 AM

    Nop,Save the Inernet fro this bugs…..

    Reply
  476. shailendra shuklaApril 24, 2015 at 8:32 AM

    no naver

    Reply
  477. Sankar Kumar MondalApril 24, 2015 at 8:34 AM

    No, it should not be abolished

    Reply
  478. Sunil Kumar SharmaApril 24, 2015 at 8:34 AM

    No, Net neutrality is must require for growing India.
    India is a developing country, where still computer,Lap top, smart phones & Internet etc. is out of reach of most of the peoples as they can not afford it. India is a most youngest population country where more than 65 % populations are in below 35 Age group. This population should have easy acceptability of internet for better growth of themselves & the country too. We are already paying money for internet access then why Internet provider companies need to limit it ????? If any one doing better then you is not mean that we have to attach him, better option is to improve our business model, services & innovation to improve. Hope Modi government will take necessary steps.

    Reply
  479. Sankar Kumar MondalApril 24, 2015 at 8:35 AM

    No it should not be abolished

    Reply
  480. Harihar KrishnanApril 24, 2015 at 8:35 AM

    No

    Reply
  481. Should never be

    Reply
  482. Ubaidullah KhanApril 24, 2015 at 8:38 AM

    No..The net neutrality should not be abolished. As we all know the internet has become the fourth fundamental need of the human being. It is very important that, we should implement net neutrality as soon as possible.

    Reply
  483. altaf shaikhApril 24, 2015 at 8:39 AM

    its our right…..govt cant play such dirty politics with us….

    Reply
  484. gulshan madhanApril 24, 2015 at 8:39 AM

    yes

    Reply
  485. sidharth karapurkarApril 24, 2015 at 8:42 AM

    NO, We need uniform speed , charges etc.

    Reply
  486. Net neutrality is future. It is there to stay

    Reply
  487. Kamal DhamApril 24, 2015 at 8:44 AM

    No, It should not be abolished. Imagine the internet bill as it will increase many folds.

    Reply
  488. No. We should have equal access to internet.

    Reply
  489. No Net Neutrality must not be abolished. Net Neutrality is as essential as getting free air for breathing.

    Reply
  490. Suraj Kumar PandeyApril 24, 2015 at 8:47 AM

    I am for Net neutrality

    Reply
  491. Net Neutrality should not be Abolished, I am in favour of Net Neutrality.

    Reply
  492. Etheldreda D'SouzaApril 24, 2015 at 8:51 AM

    Net Neutrality should NOT be abolished

    Reply
  493. Akshay MohiteApril 24, 2015 at 8:52 AM

    NO

    Reply
  494. keep things the way it is. why play into the hands of the corporates. It is high time for the corporates to fleece general population.

    Reply
  495. YOGESH KECHEApril 24, 2015 at 8:58 AM

    #SAVETHEINTERNET.
    #SAVETHEINTERNET.
    #SAVETHEINTERNET.
    #SAVETHEINTERNET.
    #SAVETHEINTERNET.
    #SAVETHEINTERNET.
    #SAVETHEINTERNET.
    #SAVETHEINTERNET.
    Internet traffic should be equally distributed without prioritizing specific sites. Net neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  496. No. Net Neutrality should NOT be abolished.

    Reply
  497. A BIG NO
    Net neutrality should not be abolished. we all should have free and equal access to the Internet

    Reply
  498. KIRANKUMAR TADHAWALAApril 24, 2015 at 8:59 AM

    No… Net Neutrality not abolished.. its all our indians equal rights to use Internet.

    Reply
  499. YES

    Reply
  500. Net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  501. Santosh ChauhanApril 24, 2015 at 9:05 AM

    No. It should never be abolished.
    It should be provided as our basic RIGHT and there should not be any discussion made in future about it in any manner.

    Reply
  502. No, Net neutrality should not be abolished. there must be free and equal access to the users of Internet. savetheinternet

    Reply
  503. no, Net neutrality should not be abolished. we all should have free and equal access to the Internet. #savetheinternet

    Reply
  504. NET NEUTRALITY SHOULD BE THERE… IT SHOULD NOT BE ABOLISHED.

    Reply
  505. P RavindraApril 24, 2015 at 9:08 AM

    YES

    Reply
  506. NO…not at all…

    Reply
  507. sravan kumar kankanalaApril 24, 2015 at 9:13 AM

    #saveinternet

    Reply
  508. no, Net neutrality should not be abolished. we all should have free and equal access to the Internet. #savetheinternet

    Reply
  509. Suraj MeshramApril 24, 2015 at 9:19 AM

    no, Net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  510. why different rate to accesses to internet webpage ????
    because users are not away and inform to rules………
    please opinion to ……..thanks………………………

    Reply
  511. No never

    Reply
  512. No….

    Reply
  513. Nishant SaxenaApril 24, 2015 at 9:23 AM

    No net neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  514. NO ! We must have equal right to access internet.

    Reply
  515. Abhinay SaxenaApril 24, 2015 at 9:27 AM

    No! Equal access to all Net users is a part of the fundamental right of freedom of expression & must not be tinkered with in a democracy.

    Reply
  516. ojaswi ranaApril 24, 2015 at 9:29 AM

    NO

    Reply
  517. No,it should not be abolished. Net neutrality give every individuals the freedom whether rich or poor to get access to the internet. Internet is helping small entrepreneur to sell their products. Students are using internet for research work. Abolishing net neutrality means enlarging the gap between the rich and the poor even more. Internet must be a free space. #savetheinternet #saveourfreedom #savethepoor #savethestudents #saveourplanet #saveusfromcapitalism.

    Reply
  518. Deepak KumarApril 24, 2015 at 9:30 AM

    No, internet should free from any boundage

    Reply
  519. ASIS KUMAR PATTANAIKApril 24, 2015 at 9:31 AM

    NO

    Reply
  520. SOUMYAJIT NAGApril 24, 2015 at 9:32 AM

    NO

    Reply
  521. NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

    Reply
  522. arupchattoApril 24, 2015 at 9:33 AM

    Net neutrality should never be abolished.

    Reply
  523. No,
    because we all are humans & net neutrality should be there.

    Reply
  524. JASVIR SINGH RAVIApril 24, 2015 at 9:34 AM

    yes

    Reply
  525. B) No

    Reply
  526. Manoj MehraApril 24, 2015 at 9:36 AM

    NO

    Reply
  527. If it is beneficial why debate it?
    However, from the above write up it seems more access and freedom to all. If so – then it is – No.

    Reply
  528. amar suryawanshiApril 24, 2015 at 9:36 AM

    net neutrality should not be abolished. It is like our money and must allow to
    spend it as we like.

    Reply
  529. it must be maintained for a transparent future of the country.

    Reply
  530. we should have the freedom to access our internet cause the companies cant decide which site we can see and which not to.
    we r paying them already a big amount to use internet. we r paying them money per mb . so my we is they should not not abolish this.

    Reply
  531. vyankateshApril 24, 2015 at 9:39 AM

    No.

    Reply
  532. NO…not at all. The rules and principles of Democracy should apply to the Cyber World too and people should have access to what they want in a free and fair manner. The telcome operatons (ISPs) just should not be allowed to supress the freedom of using internet by the common people. Time has changed and internet has become more than just a requirement…an ESSENTIAL UTILITY!

    Reply
  533. A big NO!
    Abolishing Net Neutrality would mean India lags behind year by year…..

    Reply
  534. Rajesh R. NagpureApril 24, 2015 at 9:42 AM

    Net neutrality should not be abolished…
    From my side it is a big NO..

    Reply
  535. Nitin PatelApril 24, 2015 at 9:45 AM

    No.

    Reply
  536. datta vhatkarApril 24, 2015 at 9:46 AM

    NO, internet should free from any bondage to all

    Reply
  537. datta vhatkarApril 24, 2015 at 9:46 AM

    no

    Reply
  538. Adarsh Kumar CaplashApril 24, 2015 at 9:46 AM

    Net neutrality is as essential for every Indian resident as oxygen to survive. Hence I strongly favour net neutrality

    Reply
  539. KIRIT B.DAVEApril 24, 2015 at 9:48 AM

    NET NEUTRALITY IS MUST AS EVERY ONE WILL BE ALLOWED EQUALLY TO SURF OF THEIR OWN CHOICE . THIS IS THE ONLY WAY TO GET EVERY PERSON INVOLVED IN TO THE MAIN STREAM .

    Reply
  540. Prof. Bodhidharma DipankarApril 24, 2015 at 9:49 AM

    WE must preserve the Freedom/ Liberty which are most important human values, these are human rights, enshrined in our constitution. I am for Net Neutrality and that is to be preserved at any cost. In fact the poll on internet is not enough. Let all the youth of this country show the solidarity and demonstrate that: they are for Net Neutrality.

    Reply
  541. No…

    Reply
  542. Bodhidharma DipankarApril 24, 2015 at 9:51 AM

    I am for net Neutrality. Liberty/ Freedom are extremely important human values, human rights, enshrined in our constitution, to be preserved @ any cost.

    Reply
  543. There should be equal opportunity for all.
    In broader sense freedom with restrictions on its misuse is necessary.

    Reply
  544. No,we should be allowed to use net freely as we want without any restrictions. I

    Reply
  545. Net neutrality must remain

    Reply
  546. NO

    We need Net Neutrality.

    Reply
  547. AjithprasadApril 24, 2015 at 9:59 AM

    No. Net neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  548. John JosephApril 24, 2015 at 10:00 AM

    No, net neutrality should not be abolished. I am even of the view that the people/parties/platforms who/which are against the net neutrality should be boycotted by the general public i.e the people who are in favour of net neutrality.

    Reply
  549. Uday MaratheApril 24, 2015 at 10:00 AM

    No,It should not be abolished.

    Reply
  550. Answer – No

    Reply
  551. sandeep sharmaApril 24, 2015 at 10:02 AM

    NO, It should not be abolished, Everybody should have right to surf as per their choice with equal speed in web.

    Reply
  552. it’ll simply be a disaster for India if net neutrality is abolished.
    National as well as regional development in terms of education,projects under different sectors like infrastructure,health,finance,economy, transport,banking,hospitality,tourism etc will be stuck and it might be possible that there will be an exponential downward movement in all these sectors in India.

    SO IT’S A BIG FAT NO..

    Reply
  553. Ratan PrakashApril 24, 2015 at 10:05 AM

    NO

    Reply
  554. Net Neutrality Should Not Be Abolished & Let People Use Their Own Wisdom Arising Out of Need to What Should be Chosen While Surfing Sites… Good or Bad, Need or Want…

    Have a Great Day to All…

    Reply
  555. TODAY’S DEMAND IS IN LINE WITH GOI ‘S AMBITION TO MAKE INDIA ADVANCED AND GROWING AND IT WOULD BE POSSIBLE ONLY IF EACH AND EVERY CITIZEN RIGHT FROM POORER TO RICHEST WOULD GET NET ACCESSIBILITY. IN NO WHERE THE DEMAND OF SERVICE PROVIDERS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED

    Reply
  556. No, it shouldn’t be abolish

    Reply
  557. a p somkuwarApril 24, 2015 at 10:11 AM

    No

    Reply
  558. noooooo n3t neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  559. Sudhir VaidyaApril 24, 2015 at 10:12 AM

    No,It should not be abolished.

    Reply
  560. sanjay dandekarApril 24, 2015 at 10:12 AM

    yes

    Reply
  561. SYDNEY PRAMANICK ISAACApril 24, 2015 at 10:13 AM

    NO NET NEUTRALITY SHOULD BE THERE AS WE CAN USE AND SEE WHAT WE WANT TO

    Reply
  562. NITIN KUMARApril 24, 2015 at 10:14 AM

    NO……..

    A BIG NO TO NET NEUTRALITY ..

    Reply
  563. AjithprasadApril 24, 2015 at 10:14 AM

    It looks the ISPs are trying to make even (and go for a kill) the huge amount they shelled out buying spectrum in the auction. They have to get back that amount from the customers. Increasing the call rate immediately after the auction, they know is, going to be a real difficult issue. This is a good way of doing it, as it is less obvious, more harmful in the long run though. Sad that this done in collusion with the Ministry, which is supposed to protect our, common peoples’ interest.
    This needs to be resisted by all cost.

    Reply
  564. sunil godhwaniApril 24, 2015 at 10:15 AM

    no no way

    Reply
  565. Prabhakar BethiApril 24, 2015 at 10:15 AM

    No, Net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Net neutrality is essential for online innovations.

    Reply
  566. internet is a free to all and nobody try to neutral in one or many organization let internet to free to gather and share knowledge

    Reply
  567. Shyam MaheshwariApril 24, 2015 at 10:17 AM

    There is no such thing as Net Neutrality. The basic structure of Tariff Plans is like if you want higher speed of internet, you have to pay more. I can not pay more, I will get speed of 2 mbps or less, if you can pay more, you will buy plan of 20 mbps or more. The question of whether to abolish Net Neutrality or not does not arise as long as the pricing structure is like this.

    Reply
    • Shyam MaheshwariApril 24, 2015 at 10:26 AM

      My comments on Net Neutrality was not published in the quickheal blogs for the reason “Awaiting Moderation” whereas it was written in plain and simple words without any exaggeration.

      Reply
  568. We should have equal access to internet.We need Net Neutrality.

    Reply
  569. Sarvesh R .AlagundagiApril 24, 2015 at 10:17 AM

    NO

    Reply
  570. No.

    Reply
  571. SWETA DUTTAApril 24, 2015 at 10:18 AM

    No.. net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  572. Anil WadhwaniApril 24, 2015 at 10:18 AM

    No. It shall be abolished.

    Reply
  573. Vikash KumarApril 24, 2015 at 10:18 AM

    No

    Reply
  574. SESHPANDE SHRIPAD LAXMANApril 24, 2015 at 10:19 AM

    Sir,
    with respect Yes neutrality is very essential. I PERSONALLY feel that we have been cheated in rates & speed also. Speed must be same to everybody, not on what he pays. WHY caller I.D. chargess are separately charged in the mobile Bills, is it require any extra machinary or labour charges for Mobile Company.
    THANK U for giving us oppotunity to express. I am layman.Idont know any technical knowledge.
    yours sincerly

    Deshpande.s.l.

    Reply
  575. Sunder ChowdharyApril 24, 2015 at 10:20 AM

    No… Net Neutrality should not be abolished as it would be very difficult to work in the future scenario wherever the question of net usability will appear. It should be the choice of users and not ISP’s.

    Reply
  576. P BalakotaiahApril 24, 2015 at 10:22 AM

    Net nuetrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  577. chandran kaniApril 24, 2015 at 10:22 AM

    NO . net neutrality has not to be abolished. internet services has to be without any discrimination of any form and should be freely accessed.

    Reply
  578. CA. Kamlesh Singh ChauhanApril 24, 2015 at 10:22 AM

    No, Net neutrality should not be abolished as it will lead to dominance of rich segment of society on net and against the principle of equality.

    Reply
  579. Mohit UpadhyayApril 24, 2015 at 10:23 AM

    NO

    Reply
  580. NOOOO…
    NET NEUTRALITY IS THE MAIN POWER OF INTERNET WHICH ALLOWS AN INDIVIDUAL TO ACCESS EVERY DATA PACKET OF HUMAN ADVANCEMENT OF CIVILIZATION. IT IS A RIGHT TO EVERY HUMAN BEING. MONEY IN THIS CASE WILL MAKE US RETARDED.

    Reply
  581. Shiv Raj BansalApril 24, 2015 at 10:24 AM

    I fully agree with everyone that it should not be abolished.

    Reply
  582. P.V.GANGADHARANApril 24, 2015 at 10:24 AM

    NO, Internet should be access able to every individual, rich or poor.No monopoly should be there.

    Reply
  583. Sachin PaleshaApril 24, 2015 at 10:25 AM

    Net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  584. NO, It should not be abolished, Everybody should have right to surf as per their choice with equal speed in web

    Reply
  585. No

    Without net neutrality on line commerce will not be as competitive as now and the common man will definetly suffer.

    Reply
  586. Ashish I VakilApril 24, 2015 at 10:28 AM

    NO
    Net neutrality must be there

    Reply
  587. PIJUS KANTI BATABYALApril 24, 2015 at 10:29 AM

    NO. EVERY NET USER HAS EQUAL RIGHT.

    Reply
  588. Shiv Raj BansalApril 24, 2015 at 10:29 AM

    All Internet Services which are free today for everyone should be free forever and everywhere?

    Reply
  589. Biswanath BeheraApril 24, 2015 at 10:29 AM

    No net neutrality should not be abolished. It is up to the user to use internet at its convenience.

    Reply
  590. Pravat R MohantyApril 24, 2015 at 10:32 AM

    No.Net neutrality should NOT be abolished

    Reply
  591. NO WAY

    Reply
  592. NO Net neutrality should not be abolished. All Internet sites should be accessible to all without any preferences, and without any extra cost.

    Reply
  593. no..

    Reply
  594. Pravat R MohantyApril 24, 2015 at 10:35 AM

    NET NEUTRALITY IS MY RIGHT. IT MUST NOT ABOLISHED

    Reply
  595. no, net netrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  596. Dipendu GangulyApril 24, 2015 at 10:37 AM

    SHOULD NOT BE ABOLISHED

    Reply
  597. No,net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  598. Never

    Reply
  599. R ChakrabortyApril 24, 2015 at 10:39 AM

    No. Net neutrality should NOT be abolished.

    Reply
  600. NO NO NO. All content on the web should be treated equally. The telcos were always greedy and they are becoming more and more greedy! Paisa paisa….pa pa pa paisa paisa….is all that they want!

    Reply
  601. Gourishankar SoniApril 24, 2015 at 10:46 AM

    No

    Reply
  602. Dy.Manager(F&A),M.S.E.D.CO.LTD.April 24, 2015 at 10:47 AM

    The solution should be found to make internet more affordable…..

    Reply
  603. BIPIN BISWASApril 24, 2015 at 10:48 AM

    No

    Reply
  604. Rohit SinhaApril 24, 2015 at 10:50 AM

    yes people have right to surf equal speed of net for all app

    Reply
  605. Divanshu GautamApril 24, 2015 at 10:51 AM

    Well Its a BIG NOOOOOOO to the abolishment of Net Neutrality

    Reply
  606. Rohit SinhaApril 24, 2015 at 10:52 AM

    yes should be abolish

    Reply
  607. no it should not be abolished

    Reply
  608. alok shuklaApril 24, 2015 at 10:54 AM

    yes, this not good for us. i oppose net neutrality.

    Reply
  609. alok shuklaApril 24, 2015 at 10:54 AM

    NOT GOOD FOR ALL OF US.

    Reply
  610. ABDUL KADERApril 24, 2015 at 10:55 AM

    No net neutrality. It is cruelty from present government in order to gain private net bidder, happened to be government’s supporters.

    Reply
  611. b.K.chakrabortyApril 24, 2015 at 10:55 AM

    No. Net nuetrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  612. surinder kumarApril 24, 2015 at 10:56 AM

    No.Net neutrality should NOT be abolished.

    Reply
  613. Md. FakhruddinApril 24, 2015 at 10:56 AM

    NO, NET NEUTRALITY SHOULD NOT BE ABOLISHED.

    Reply
  614. Manoj KumarApril 24, 2015 at 10:56 AM

    No.

    Reply
  615. b.K.chakrabortyApril 24, 2015 at 10:57 AM

    no. net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  616. Mayank GoyalApril 24, 2015 at 10:59 AM

    No Way

    Reply
  617. No, it should not be abolished.

    Reply
  618. Net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  619. For All sites related to Medical and Education should be free and other sites may be charged.

    Reply
  620. Ashwin KumarApril 24, 2015 at 11:07 AM

    No. Net Neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  621. Sushil GakharApril 24, 2015 at 11:08 AM

    No

    Reply
  622. Bishwajeet SinhaApril 24, 2015 at 11:08 AM

    Net neutrality is the need of hour for future growth of internet in semi-urban as well as rural India !

    Reply
  623. Mohd MustafaApril 24, 2015 at 11:10 AM

    Yes

    Reply
  624. Biswajit Guha RoyApril 24, 2015 at 11:10 AM

    Net Neutrality should not be withdrawn

    Reply
  625. Net Neutrality should not be abolished. It is the Bread & Butter of every Net user. Net is our Necessity not a Luxury . How can someone takeaway my basic Necessity ?

    Reply
  626. Everybody/anybody should have right to do surfing of their choice from any site except porn sites which may have to be totally banned.

    Reply
  627. Biswajit Guha RoyApril 24, 2015 at 11:15 AM

    Net Neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  628. Amruta Ganesh JoshiApril 24, 2015 at 11:15 AM

    NO

    Reply
  629. DR. UJJWAL BARAN PRADHAN,WBAS(Admn.)April 24, 2015 at 11:18 AM

    NO

    Reply
  630. Ganesh S JoshiApril 24, 2015 at 11:19 AM

    NO

    Reply
  631. staNLEY PAUL KATIKALAApril 24, 2015 at 11:20 AM

    NET NUTRALITY IS THE SYMBOL OF CULTURE OF THE HUMANITY OF THE DAY. HOW CAN WE CALL OURSELF THAT WE ARE THE INTELLIGENT CREATURES IN THE CREATION OF THE GOD AS OF TODAY.

    Reply
  632. No. Net neutrality should not be abolished. All are equal – no casteism please.

    Reply
  633. Tej NakasheApril 24, 2015 at 11:23 AM

    No net neutrality should not be abolished and there should be no discrimination on this basis.

    Reply
  634. No. Net neutrality should be maintained, it is a right of every citizen

    Reply
  635. K.RajendranApril 24, 2015 at 11:24 AM

    No.In a democratic country like India where most of them are poor/middle class people, net neutrality is a must.

    Reply
  636. STANLEY PAUL KATIKALAApril 24, 2015 at 11:25 AM

    NET NUTRALITY IS THE SYMBOL OF CULTURE OF THE HUMANITY OF THE DAY. HOW CAN WE CALL OURSELF THAT WE ARE THE INTELLIGENT CREATURES IN THE CREATION OF THE GOD AS OF TODAY.

    Reply
  637. Anil DisaleApril 24, 2015 at 11:28 AM

    No net neutrality should not be abolished…
    Its a right of everyone….

    Reply
  638. I vote for vote neutrality.

    Reply
  639. No, Net Neutrality must prevail …

    Reply
  640. Parth agarwalApril 24, 2015 at 11:31 AM

    YES

    Reply
  641. hemant kulkarniApril 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM

    NO, It should not be abolished, Everybody should have right to surf as per their choice with equal speed in web.

    Reply
  642. SHUBHAM MAMGAINApril 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM

    YES

    Reply
  643. K EswarachariApril 24, 2015 at 11:33 AM

    net neutrality should be maintained in the interest of net users and consumers.

    Reply
  644. Net neutrality should not be abolished. All Internet sites should be accessible to all without any preferences, and without any extra cost.

    Reply
  645. Roshan AlexApril 24, 2015 at 11:34 AM

    NO, Net Neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  646. Internet is for all? why discrimination on this?

    Reply
  647. Internet is for all. Then why discrimination on this?

    Reply
  648. parvern kumarApril 24, 2015 at 11:36 AM

    I have poll for no.

    Reply
  649. BHAVIK JOSHIApril 24, 2015 at 11:36 AM

    NO

    Reply
  650. NO Net neutrality should not be abolished. All Internet sites should be accessible to all without any preferences, and without any extra cost.

    Reply
  651. ANIRUDDHA SHENDEApril 24, 2015 at 11:37 AM

    Net Neutrality must be continued & it is necessary in India.

    Reply
  652. no it should not be abolished.7zy4

    Reply
  653. Net neutrality should not abolished. It is right

    Reply
  654. It should not be abolished.

    Reply
  655. Deepak ModiApril 24, 2015 at 11:45 AM

    No, Net Neutrality shouldn’t be abolished. The question you placed for comment is intelligently crafted, many would not understand and may answer yes.

    Everyone who pays the ISP for internet service has and must have the equal right to access the service to any site without any biased intention for the ISP because to demand more or get paid from the website or the applications to load faster then others.

    Reply
  656. Swapnil JadhavApril 24, 2015 at 11:47 AM

    Not in any case. Net should be equal to all. The rights of altering these speeds should not be given to any private concern.

    Reply
  657. Naveen ChouriyaApril 24, 2015 at 11:47 AM

    No

    Reply
  658. shailesh hirdayApril 24, 2015 at 11:47 AM

    NO

    Reply
  659. bhagyashree maskeApril 24, 2015 at 11:47 AM

    Yes

    Reply
  660. My answer is strictly NO NO … in which world we are heading to , on the one hand we are fighting for our fundamental right , women empowerment , equality and quality of life and on the other hand putting curbs in modern day life , is it not sycophancy ???

    Reply
  661. umesh kananiApril 24, 2015 at 11:49 AM

    No, net nutrality shoud not be abolished, government must interfear in this metter.

    Reply
  662. Yogesh TalwarApril 24, 2015 at 11:49 AM

    No it should not be abolished

    Reply
  663. Janardan GuneApril 24, 2015 at 11:52 AM

    Net neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  664. PARVESH KHULLARApril 24, 2015 at 11:54 AM

    NET NEUTRALITY should NOT be abolished at all.
    we talk a lot about personal,financial, social independence . then why not one should have independence over internet usage? There are other ways also to engage more n more people in internet using. but by restricting some websites over one particular network won’t benefit customer but ISPs only .

    Reply
  665. Dr Mahesh kumar GroverApril 24, 2015 at 11:55 AM

    on one hand govt wants internet penetration to villages and on the other they want to make this difficult.i am in favour of net neutrality

    Reply
  666. Ajay BansalApril 24, 2015 at 11:55 AM

    YES

    Reply
  667. Net Neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  668. Pushkal BhawsarApril 24, 2015 at 11:57 AM

    Every one must get same speed of Internet on all sites.

    Reply
  669. Navneet SethiaApril 24, 2015 at 11:59 AM

    NOOOOO it should not be abolished.

    Reply
  670. RICHERS/NAGUApril 24, 2015 at 12:00 PM

    YES…

    Reply
  671. A.VENKATASUBAMANIANApril 24, 2015 at 12:01 PM

    YES

    Reply
  672. Ajit Singh RathoreApril 24, 2015 at 12:07 PM

    NO it should not be abolished

    Reply
  673. Gopinath SahooApril 24, 2015 at 12:10 PM

    NO

    Reply
  674. Net Neutrality is a must not only for me, you , the common man. Not only for those who cannot afford to pay high two three folds.
    But also for the corporates, the bands who want to control Net-Traffic. It is because more the net reaches to the last man, more it shall be beneficial for the companies.

    Reply
  675. Manish SharmaApril 24, 2015 at 12:12 PM

    YES

    Reply
  676. No.

    Net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Every body should have right to access any website, application etc, equally and with fast speed.

    Reply
  677. No It Should not Abolished, we are living in Republic Counrty with Full Freedom. There should be Freedom for Internet.

    Reply
  678. No,there should be no discrimination

    Reply
  679. No,there should not be discrimination

    Reply
  680. Arvind SrivastavaApril 24, 2015 at 12:20 PM

    No. Net neutrality must not be abolished. Every citizen should have freedom to surf net according to his/her choice without any hindrance and extra cost.

    Reply
  681. My poll is no.

    Reply
  682. Amit MulaniApril 24, 2015 at 12:25 PM

    No, It shouldn’t Abolished.

    Reply
  683. Jidnyasa NashikkarApril 24, 2015 at 12:26 PM

    No

    Reply
  684. mickey kapadiaApril 24, 2015 at 12:26 PM

    Just as the air we breathe is free …. so should the internet. The internet has become the most important media as on date, if it is curbed or re-directed to paid sites the essence of freedom is lost. Those with power and money will monopolize what we watch or read or see.

    Reply
  685. MD.WASI AHMEDApril 24, 2015 at 12:26 PM

    NO

    Reply
  686. YES. ITS NEEDED

    Reply
  687. Dileep Kumar.GApril 24, 2015 at 12:29 PM

    Net neutrality should not abolished. It is right

    Reply
  688. Yes

    Reply
  689. dipankar mazumdarApril 24, 2015 at 12:30 PM

    No

    Reply
  690. HUMERA SHIRINApril 24, 2015 at 12:30 PM

    NO

    Reply
  691. Manoj kumarApril 24, 2015 at 12:34 PM

    no… status co required ….no new restrictions on this

    Reply
  692. No, It should not be abolished

    Reply
  693. Kartik RanpiseApril 24, 2015 at 12:35 PM

    Net Neutrality should not be abolished at all. Internet is known for it’s openness hence abolishing it would be injustice to all internet user community.

    Reply
  694. mehul vasaniApril 24, 2015 at 12:37 PM

    NO. Neutrality should NOT be abolished.There should be no discrimination

    Reply
  695. Kritika MishraApril 24, 2015 at 12:37 PM

    Net Neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  696. Manoj kumarApril 24, 2015 at 12:38 PM

    B. No

    Reply
  697. John CherianApril 24, 2015 at 12:40 PM

    No.Net neutrality should not be abolished.Statusquo should continue.

    Reply
  698. Yes, I am for net neutrality. A worthy concept infact

    Reply
  699. NET NEUTRALITY OUR RIGHT. IT SHOULD NOT BE ABOLISHED

    Reply
  700. No,net neutrality should not be oblidge,every user should have equal rights to access whatever they wants to,no service provider or government can decide how much we can access or download,it’s just an another way to charge & make us pay higher rates with different number’s of packs.My answer is ABSOLUTELY NOT.”SAVE THE INTERNET”

    Reply
  701. ABHINAV KUMARApril 24, 2015 at 12:49 PM

    No it should not be abolished.

    Reply
  702. No. Net Neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  703. Net neutrality is must.
    Net should not be allowed to be used by few for minting money.
    Each & every individual should have access all over the net free of cost as it is now.

    Reply
  704. hitesh mehtaApril 24, 2015 at 12:57 PM

    we are already pay more for net now how much we pay for the same … in spite of pay monthly charges and plan why we should pay more for other access in one thing why we pay two time separately Trai working for public ya companies…. Airtel must be ban ….in india

    Reply
  705. Awadhesh SrivastwaApril 24, 2015 at 12:58 PM

    YES. I am in favor of NET neutrality should be abolished. Percentage of people are wasting their time on the NET. Those who needs the NET should pay for the same. Only registered School, Colleges and Institutions should allow for free uses.For others it should be paid.

    Reply
  706. PRAMODSHIVAMApril 24, 2015 at 12:58 PM

    NO

    Reply
  707. Rajendra SinghApril 24, 2015 at 1:01 PM

    big No, it is universal resource and should be available to one and all without any regulations.

    Reply
  708. M N MUKHERJEEApril 24, 2015 at 1:02 PM

    No, Net Neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  709. No, it should not be abolished……

    Reply
  710. Net Neutrality must be Abolished. I poll for YES.

    Reply
  711. KAMLESH BAKHAIApril 24, 2015 at 1:09 PM

    NO.ITS A DOOM. TRIED AND TESTED METHODS SHOULD NOT BE ALTERED

    Reply
  712. Santhosh BhandariApril 24, 2015 at 1:10 PM

    Yes it should be abolished..!!!

    Reply
  713. Pradeep JainApril 24, 2015 at 1:11 PM

    Yes

    Reply
  714. Pradeep JainApril 24, 2015 at 1:13 PM

    Net Neutrality should be abolished.

    Reply
  715. Vishal TorneApril 24, 2015 at 1:14 PM

    From Me It is a Big NO !! Net Should be equal and neutral to all of Us.. Because we have the right to information and It should accessible to anyone for any purpose other than illegal or immoral terms.As we see ads about Internet is useful to learn so It is required that every information should be available to any person through Internet.

    Reply
  716. Rahul YadavApril 24, 2015 at 1:14 PM

    I support Net Neutrality.

    Reply
  717. Dadasaheb UkaleApril 24, 2015 at 1:15 PM

    Yes….it should be abolished really….as Republic of India, we dont want such businesses that will harm our independence and rights…..

    Reply
  718. AJAY PATTANAIKApril 24, 2015 at 1:15 PM

    NO.

    Reply
  719. nooooooooooo

    Reply
  720. Pradeep KunachgiApril 24, 2015 at 1:16 PM

    No.Net neutrality should NOT be abolished.

    Reply
  721. shyam sihareApril 24, 2015 at 1:17 PM

    No

    Reply
  722. Dayanshu Shekhar MishraApril 24, 2015 at 1:20 PM

    No

    Reply
  723. sps sachdevaApril 24, 2015 at 1:21 PM

    NO

    Reply
  724. SHIVAJI SINGHApril 24, 2015 at 1:21 PM

    it should be accessible to every one!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  725. Minesh SoniApril 24, 2015 at 1:24 PM

    NO, Net neutrality must not be abolished.

    Reply
  726. RANJAN SRIVASTAVAApril 24, 2015 at 1:27 PM

    YES,As being the INDIAN CITIZEN it is our right to have it.

    Reply
  727. Manoj KumarApril 24, 2015 at 1:27 PM

    yes

    Reply
  728. BurhanuddinApril 24, 2015 at 1:28 PM

    No…..it should not be abolished…….. I PROMOTE NET NEUTRALITY
    Everybody has a right to surf the net at high speeds and without any discrimination……………….. I use airtel but i want to have net neutrality because it will abolish extra payment for high speeds.

    Reply
  729. Anil MauryaApril 24, 2015 at 1:30 PM

    Net should not be destroyed, it should be as per existing practice.

    Reply
  730. NO. Neutrality should NOT be abolished.

    Reply
  731. No, it never should be abolished and that should not be brought further.

    Reply
  732. Rajiv VermaApril 24, 2015 at 1:41 PM

    Net neutrality should never be abolished….companies or professionals who are try to implement this should be….

    Reply
  733. Rajiv VermaApril 24, 2015 at 1:42 PM

    Net neutrality should never be abolished….companies or professionals who are trying to implement this should be….

    Reply
  734. NO NET NEUTRALITY SHOULD NOT BE ABOLISHED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  735. NO. NET NEUTRALITY SHOULD NEVER EVER BE ABOLISHED!!!!!!!!!!!! EVERYONE SHUD CONTINUE TO HAVE ACCESS TO THE INTERNET AND ITS OFFERS AND BENEFITS.

    CHOICE : (B)

    Reply
  736. No

    Reply
  737. A BIG NOOOOO.. net neutrality should never be abolished.

    Reply
  738. K. JeyarajApril 24, 2015 at 1:49 PM

    No, should not be abolished.

    Reply
  739. Suresh BhadApril 24, 2015 at 1:51 PM

    No Net Neutrality should not be abolished at any cost.
    The internet charges in India are at a very high rates in first place. Abolishing Neutrality will kill the freedom.

    Reply
  740. YES
    NET has to be Neutral

    Reply
  741. No it should not stop.
    Equality matters a lot.

    Reply
  742. Mrs. Shubhangi S. LadsaongikarApril 24, 2015 at 1:57 PM

    No, net neutrality should not be abolished. Net neutrality should remain.

    Reply
  743. Om Prakash MohantyApril 24, 2015 at 2:04 PM

    No, Net neutrality should not be abolished. It is like cutting your freedom of choice.

    Reply
  744. No,net neutrality cannot and should not be abolished.Abolishing net neutrality indirectly means creating rifts in virtual space like we see in real life.It means creating hurdles in accessing information by adding unnecessary add-on costs.

    Reply
  745. NO,Net Neutrality Should not Be Abolished.

    Reply
  746. Amrit RavalApril 24, 2015 at 2:16 PM

    No net nutrality should be there

    Reply
  747. Every one must have right to surf web as per their requirement.

    Reply
  748. NO,NET NEUTRALITY SHOULD NOT BE ABOLISHED AT ALL.
    ITS LIKE GOING TO A RESTAURANT, PAYING FOR WHAT YOU EAT BUT CHOICE IN GETTING IS NOT YOURS.
    WHEN CUSTOMER IS PAYING FOR A PURPOSE HE SHOULD BE GIVEN COMPLETE FREEDOM TO CHOOSE. NO VENDOR SHOULD BE ALLOWED WHAT TO, HOW TO, WHEN TO SERVE.

    Reply
  749. Subhabrata PalApril 24, 2015 at 2:21 PM

    Hi,

    off the bat, i troll a lot and i try to stand up for what is right. India should become a country worth saving first. the saviors will come from us.

    Everybody should have his say just because you can publicly PROVE him or her or anybody WRONG with YOUR logic. I have the freedom to prove him wrong right then and there. and everybody would be able to read what I have written and judge it for themselves.

    If it doesn’t happen that way, we may become more prosperous, we may become whatever it is we are going to become one way or another, we will become slaves again.

    let us not become slaves again, only when a man or a woman is truly free he or she will become better. Anything less will evaporate over a generation. Given actual freedom, Indians will become actually free.

    And we can handle it. online

    Regards.

    Reply
  750. VIPUL NARULAApril 24, 2015 at 2:24 PM

    NO NET NEUTRALITY SHOULD NOT BE ABOLISHED

    Reply
  751. Sunil SuleApril 24, 2015 at 2:26 PM

    NO, It should not be abolished, Everybody should have right to surf as per their choice.

    Reply
  752. Amit Sankar DasApril 24, 2015 at 2:28 PM

    Net should be neutral.

    Reply
  753. Amit Sankar DasApril 24, 2015 at 2:29 PM

    Net should be neutral to everyone.

    Reply
  754. net Neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  755. No. Net Neutrality should not be abolished. Its our right to access webpages as per our choice. The operators can not force us to like their choice. strongly oppose them. Make protest.

    Reply
  756. YES. NET NEUTRALITY IS REQUIRED TO SAVE THE INTERNET.

    WE DONT WANT ANY TAILOR MADE SERVICES BY ISPs ON NET.

    Reply
  757. No. Net neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  758. Yes..Net Neutralitiy is very much important for our future world

    Reply
  759. No.Net neutrality should NOT be abolished.

    Reply
  760. Shobha PawarApril 24, 2015 at 2:54 PM

    There is no doubt that Net Net Neutrality should NOT be abolished

    Reply
  761. Anil SinghApril 24, 2015 at 2:55 PM

    No. Net Neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  762. Deep Diyuti KumarApril 24, 2015 at 2:58 PM

    NO. Net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  763. sandip chauhanApril 24, 2015 at 2:59 PM

    shameless india ..ab kitna lootonge ??????

    Must not be abolished……

    It is our Fundamental right ..

    if they ..do the same….
    lets make a strick ..not to use Internet ….and file suit against article 32 of constitution.

    Reply
  764. Laksh KwatraApril 24, 2015 at 3:02 PM

    No, net neutrality should not be abolished!

    Reply
  765. Jinendra ParasarApril 24, 2015 at 3:03 PM

    I don’t understand, but one thing is I don’t want to pay again and again once i paid.

    Reply
  766. singaravelApril 24, 2015 at 3:07 PM

    We will get more things done in less time although tariff should not be too high to afford.here i’m talking about homeusers not corporate sector which will not get effected by any price hike.

    Reply
  767. NO.

    Reply
  768. No.Net neutrality should NOT be abolished.

    Reply
  769. NO…

    Reply
  770. Sandeep SinghApril 24, 2015 at 3:21 PM

    No

    Reply
  771. BINAY BISWASApril 24, 2015 at 3:21 PM

    NET NUTRALITY MUST BE MAINTAINED.

    Reply
  772. Vijay MandavkarApril 24, 2015 at 3:24 PM

    NO,Not to be abolished.

    Reply
  773. uday kumar deApril 24, 2015 at 3:26 PM

    no, never. net neutrality should be maintained.

    Reply
  774. net neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  775. No Net Nuterality should not be abolishedApril 24, 2015 at 3:36 PM

    ISP are procuring Bandwidth from Government.Government does not ask as to whether the bandwidth will be utilised in 2G, 3G or net connections in computer, then why should ISP ask. they have no right. If they donot want NET Nuterality then they should sell their business.

    Reply
  776. Swami Stapriyanand ViraktApril 24, 2015 at 3:42 PM

    NO NO NO

    Reply
  777. Swami Stapriyanand ViraktApril 24, 2015 at 3:44 PM

    NO NO NO. Neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  778. sunil kumarApril 24, 2015 at 3:51 PM

    this is shock for internet user and cheating by operator . so i should be poll NO.

    Reply
  779. No, Should be Free For Everyone! No Discrimination.

    Reply
  780. sunil kumarApril 24, 2015 at 3:57 PM

    till now all operator apply so many charge like Roaming , tariff songs entertainment and other many more .
    now this is new trick of cheating for all consumer .
    so pls stop this and be uniformly for all

    Reply
  781. Anhad NaadApril 24, 2015 at 4:01 PM

    No, Net neutrality should not be abolished!!!!!

    Reply
  782. Divyanil PatelApril 24, 2015 at 4:02 PM

    net nutrility is on of source of finincial funding for government from us.

    Reply
  783. wilma paulApril 24, 2015 at 4:02 PM

    NO. It should not be abolished.

    Reply
  784. abolished = समाप्त कर दिया
    for all those who misunderstood term ‘abolished’

    Net Neutrality Should not be abolished

    Reply
  785. Devendra KumarApril 24, 2015 at 4:07 PM

    Yes. I think one speed one data at much lower price. Net is most important for progress our nation. their should no loss no profit based scheme may be adopted by the Govt.

    Reply
  786. Prakash sharmaApril 24, 2015 at 4:07 PM

    No, Net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  787. No,Net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  788. Yogesh GuptaApril 24, 2015 at 4:09 PM

    No

    Reply
  789. Arvind DesaiApril 24, 2015 at 4:14 PM

    YES

    Reply
  790. alagappan jApril 24, 2015 at 4:14 PM

    net neutrality must exist

    Reply
  791. Bhalla RamApril 24, 2015 at 4:21 PM

    No. Net Neutralily is not abolished.

    Reply
  792. Puneet SoodApril 24, 2015 at 4:24 PM

    No Never. Internet should be neutral for every uses and application.

    So no abolition of net neutrality.

    Reply
  793. No

    Reply
  794. Thomas GeorgeApril 24, 2015 at 4:27 PM

    NO, NO, NO – ISPs in India have been adhering to the principle of Net Neutrality AND SHOULD CONTINUE TO DO SHOW NOT ALLOWING PRIVILEGES TO SOME PLUS THE DIRTY SUBTLE BUSINESS RIVALRY IT IS GOING TO CREATE. ( e.g. you buy mine its cheaper and better }

    Reply
  795. Maan GajjarApril 24, 2015 at 4:31 PM

    NO NO It Should no be followed …….
    It is only for telecom company benifit…..
    Only Net speed should be more….

    Reply
  796. Mohan ShindeApril 24, 2015 at 4:32 PM

    Net Neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  797. A big NO. Everyone should get the uniform access to the internet. But we are seeing this pattern everywhere likewise if you want hassle free road use toll road. If you don’t want to stand in queue take vip darshana. By paying some extra you are getting privileged access everywhere but poor common man is getting sucked by this system. Money can buy anything but what about who doesn’t have enough money? where he will go?

    Reply
  798. sameer shelarApril 24, 2015 at 4:32 PM

    should not be abolished.

    Reply
  799. Rajat Dey SarkarApril 24, 2015 at 4:33 PM

    No, Net neutrality should not be abolished. there must be free and equal access to the users of Internet. savetheinternet

    Reply
  800. sameer shelarApril 24, 2015 at 4:33 PM

    should not be abolished

    Reply
  801. Naman LuhanaApril 24, 2015 at 4:38 PM

    NO

    Reply
  802. Vasudha AmbekarApril 24, 2015 at 4:39 PM

    Yes , Net Neutrality should be abolished

    Reply
  803. NO

    Reply
  804. Net Neutrality…. forever

    Reply
  805. Rishabh RathodApril 24, 2015 at 4:41 PM

    NO

    Reply
  806. Vasudha AmbekarApril 24, 2015 at 4:48 PM

    I MEAN NO IT SHOULD NOT BE ABOLISHED

    Reply
  807. R.K.SharmaApril 24, 2015 at 4:56 PM

    Net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  808. No it should not be abolished.

    Reply
  809. No. Net neutrality is essential in a country like India which is still developing, which has the largest rural population where eve normal speed internet is yet to become accessiblle, which has a large number of urban users like students and person of lower amd middle income group whic would be left out of net revolution for the benefit of few already super affluent ISPs. Let India achieve the full status of a developed nation and its per capita income reach the level of at least Western Europian level then talk of abolition of net neutrality.

    Reply
  810. No, it shouldn’t be abolished. all websites must be treated equally.

    Reply
  811. Net neutrality should be continue. Govt can impose more service tax to high speed internet service if required.

    Reply
  812. NO. NEVER!

    Reply
  813. viaticsquareApril 24, 2015 at 5:29 PM

    NO.Net Neutrality should not be abolished,b’coz everyone should have the right to surf the internet without any discrimination on the basis of who pays more and who pays less to access the net.’n’ everything on the internet should be treated as equal.

    Reply
  814. NO.NEVER.

    Reply
  815. Dinesh Kumar SahApril 24, 2015 at 5:32 PM

    Net Neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  816. Jaywant ImgaleApril 24, 2015 at 5:33 PM

    NO , IT SHOULD N=BE UNCHANGED

    Reply
  817. S.K.RahejaApril 24, 2015 at 5:34 PM

    Net Neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  818. Rakesh PuriApril 24, 2015 at 5:34 PM

    No

    Reply
  819. Dinesh Kumar SahApril 24, 2015 at 5:36 PM

    No, Net Neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  820. Net neutrality should be continue

    Reply
  821. Pawan AgrawalApril 24, 2015 at 5:43 PM

    No, Net Neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  822. Pawan AgrawalApril 24, 2015 at 5:44 PM

    Net Neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  823. Santosh Arvind GaikwadApril 24, 2015 at 5:46 PM

    No…. Not at all.

    Reply
  824. apoorva sharmaApril 24, 2015 at 5:50 PM

    NO NET NEUTRALITY SHOULD NOT BE ABOLISHED

    Reply
  825. Shreya SinghApril 24, 2015 at 5:54 PM

    No.Never.Net Neutrality should not be abolished. Both websites and consumers are going to suffer if it is abolished.

    Reply
  826. Govt. sh’d pay more attention to grave n serious problems that the country is facing like RAPE Cases, farmers suicides and unemployment issues; rather than this which does not affect majority of it’s citizens and common man.
    They sh’d leave not pander to the whims of the corporates but look into providing the aims and goals they they have promised in their political manifest.
    THE LAW AGAINST SUCH LAWS MUST BE ABOLISHED AND REPLEAD.

    Reply
  827. pranay saiApril 24, 2015 at 5:59 PM

    NO net neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  828. SANJIVANI GAIKWADApril 24, 2015 at 5:59 PM

    yes

    Reply
  829. no net neutrality should not be abolished…as education has become so expensive..so will internet, then wat we student will do..?

    Reply
  830. CSR MurthyApril 24, 2015 at 6:04 PM

    No, never. Any dilution of free access to net will be denial of the right to information on the net.

    Reply
  831. No,
    If RTI should be there, Net neutrality should be there to make the flow of information/ voice of people freely and easily. abolishing it means blocking the voice of mankind/ freedom of speech.

    Reply
  832. no …please donot abolish net neutrality …net revolution among students is highly awaited in our india..

    Reply
  833. No.Net neutrality should NOT be abolished

    Reply
  834. No One India One PlaneApril 24, 2015 at 6:18 PM

    one india one rate, no Category

    Reply
  835. Kunal BhattacharyyaApril 24, 2015 at 6:30 PM

    Yes I support that.

    Reply
  836. B. Respect Net neutrality. It is like:
    If I’m paying electricity board for supplying electricity in my house; board should not impose any limitations on me whether I watch TV or Lamp or geyser. I should be set free to use incoming electricity.

    Reply
  837. NO. But why is TRAI is playing into the hands of Airtel and Vodafone ? It has the authority and power to just dismiss their opinion for the betterment and benefit of countrymen. Taking a cue from this, tomorrow electric companies may be tempted to charge separately for gadgets like AC, Fridge, TV or even using incandescent lamp or CFL or LED. This absurd opinion should have been nipped from the beginning. Again a bold and capital NO.

    Reply
  838. sanjay velakattApril 24, 2015 at 6:41 PM

    Yes it should be abolished

    Reply
  839. sanser pal singhApril 24, 2015 at 6:45 PM

    no

    Reply
  840. NO.
    Net neutrality should not be abolished.
    It should prevail.

    Reply
  841. yes… i want to access my college site faster just like FB…

    Reply
  842. Hell NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO…!!!

    Reply
  843. Sahil GulatiApril 24, 2015 at 7:18 PM

    NO! Net Neutrality should be maintained

    Reply
  844. PULKIT KHURANAApril 24, 2015 at 7:23 PM

    NO

    Reply
  845. DILIP TORANIApril 24, 2015 at 7:25 PM

    No, absolutely no.
    Net neutrality should not be abolished.

    Reply
  846. DANIEL MATHEWSApril 24, 2015 at 7:35 PM

    Net neutrality should not be abolished

    Reply
  847. No. Internet should be available to everybody with same speed.

    Reply
  848. Sudesh AjgaonkarApril 24, 2015 at 7:38 PM

    No.
    Net neutrality is the Prior Right of end user like other rights for a person.

    Reply
  849. Anupam PathakApril 24, 2015 at 7:39 PM

    No,
    Net neutrality should not be abolished.
    It should prevail.